Category Archives: AN - Blog 2008

Image of the month:

08-12-01 BLOG Image of the month

Monday, November 24, 2008 — Rangzen or “Middle Way”?

While the world was pre­oc­cu­pied with the finan­cial cri­sis, the UK Gov­ern­ment took advan­tage of pub­lic inat­ten­tion to write off Tibet. In a lit­tle pub­li­cized par­lia­men­tary state­ment on Octo­ber 29, For­eign Sec­re­tary David Miliband claimed that Tibet has actu­al­ly “always been a part of Chi­na, and that it has no claim what­so­ev­er to be viewed in any­way dif­fer­ent­ly from the rest of Chi­na.” Every­one under­stands that the elect­ed gov­ern­ments of Europe and North Amer­i­can have nev­er had any seri­ous inten­tion of sup­port­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic reform in Chi­na, or of giv­ing any tan­gi­ble sup­port to the con­quered and colo­nialised Tibetan peo­ple. But, until now, a nudge-nudge-wink-wink pre­tense of con­cern for human rights has been con­sid­ered good pub­lic rela­tions. Appar­ent­ly, it is no longer de rigeur. Gor­don Brown’s gov­ern­ment in Lon­don seized on the dis­trac­tion of the glob­al finan­cial melt­down to sig­nal to Bei­jing that its impe­ri­al­ist con­quests are a‑okay, and gave it carte-blanche to pro­ceed with any human rights vio­la­tions it wants, against its own peo­ple, or oth­ers.08-11-24 BLOG Monday, November 24, 2008 - Rangzen Read more »

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 — Not cool, California

At the very same time that Amer­i­ca as a nation chose to enter the 21st Cen­tu­ry, the cit­i­zens of Cal­i­for­nia have cho­sen to shame and dis­hon­our them­selves. Propo­si­tion 8 — a loath­some vio­la­tion of fun­da­men­tal moral law, passed in that state. This is the infa­mous ban on gay mar­riage. The deci­sion pre­vents gay cit­i­zens of Cal­i­for­nia from exer­cis­ing their most basic of human rights. It attacks and des­e­crates the prin­ci­ples of a free soci­ety, and equal­ly attacks and des­e­crates civ­i­liza­tion, love and mar­riage. By this dis­gust­ing step, Cal­i­for­nia has aligned itself with the forces of evil, and cho­sen to dupli­cate the immoral­i­ties of Com­mu­nist and Tal­iban dic­ta­tor­ships. Read more »

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 — Way cool

Way cool, Amer­i­can dudes.…”

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 (just after midnight) — To a Historian

And I did indeed read some Whit­man, just at mid­night. The first sec­tion of Leaves of Grass, “Inscrip­tions”, which of course starts with “One’s-Self I Sing”, and con­tains famil­iar poems such as “In Cab­in’d Ships at Sea”, “I Hear Amer­i­ca Singing”, “Start­ing from Pau­manok” and the superb “Song of Myself”. But among them I rel­ished one rarely cit­ed, and which I had for­got­ten: “To a His­to­ri­an”. To some­one like me, who con­sid­ers him­self both a his­to­ri­an and a Sci­ence Fic­tion writer, this one is par­tic­u­lar­ly appropriate.

You who cel­e­brate bygones,
Who have explored the out­ward, the sur­faces of the races,
the life that has exhib­it­ed itself,
Who have treat­ed of man as the crea­ture of politics,
aggre­gates, rulers and priests,
I, habi­tan of the Allegha­nies, treat­ing of him as he is in
him­self in his own rights,
Press­ing the pulse of the life that has sel­dom exhib­it­ed itself,
(the great pride of man in himself,)
Chanter of Per­son­al­i­ty, out­lin­ing what is yet to be,
I project the his­to­ry of the future.

Monday, November 3, 2008 — I Have Faith in Americans

Over the last few years, in this web­site, I’ve tak­en many crit­i­cal swipes at Amer­i­can pol­i­tics and cul­ture. Like most Cana­di­ans, I have a some­what ambiva­lent and jaun­diced atti­tude towards our south­ern cousins. Some­times this can get car­ried away. When times are at their worst, we tend to respond with the frus­trat­ed anger of some­one who has learned that his admired broth­er has turned into a drug addict or been brain­washed by the Moonies. For the times I’ve been intem­per­ate in my crit­i­cisms, I duly apol­o­gize. But let me say this: I have always admired Amer­i­ca, as most Cana­di­ans have always admired it, for the obvi­ous rea­sons. Those rea­sons can be found in the quin­tes­sen­tial­ly Amer­i­can works of art, music, phi­los­o­phy and lit­er­a­ture that are as much a part of me as the red maple leaves blow­ing in the street out­side my door are part of me. Tomor­row the Amer­i­can peo­ple will decide whether their nation is over and done with or will con­tin­ue and renew itself. If McCain is elect­ed, every­one in the world will know that Amer­i­ca is washed up, fin­ished. Nobody will ever take any Amer­i­can seri­ous­ly again. But it appears that the tide is turn­ing. Amer­i­ca seems to be re-dis­cov­er­ing itself. I have faith in the Amer­i­can peo­ple. Tonight, I’ll read Whitman.

16732. (Terje Anderson) [in blog Daily Kos] Why We Stand in Line to Vote — A Historical Photo Essay [article]

Steve Muhlberg­er’s blog Muhlberg­er’s Ear­ly His­to­ry linked to this mov­ing pho­to arti­cle in the Dai­ly Kos. For decades I’ve argued with peo­ple who thought they are being clever by not vot­ing, and who sub­se­quent­ly won­dered why they woke up in a world con­trolled by reli­gious wack­os and sleazy haters of free­dom. Well, it’s because they nev­er showed up at the polls, and the haters of free­dom made sure their min­ions did. The lame log­ic behind the “don’t vote, it only encour­ages them” notion was basi­cal­ly that, if your only weapon is a bow and arrow, and you are being hunt­ed by a some­one with a gun, you should throw away the bow and arrow. The Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty may not be a shin­ing bas­tion of rea­son and free­dom, but at the moment, the dif­fer­ence between it and the Repub­li­can Par­ty is rough­ly equiv­a­lent to the dif­fer­ence between the post-WWII democ­ra­cies and the Sovi­et Union. Remem­ber the nitwits who, back then, liked to talk as if the two were “moral­ly equiv­a­lent”? His­to­ry has turned them into jokes. Right now the last thing in the world a sane human being can claim is that the Demo­c­ra­t­ic and Repub­li­can par­ties are moral­ly equiv­a­lent. The con­trast is stark and irrefutable. Read more »

Image of the month: Hylocichla mustelina

08-11-01 BLOG Image of the month - Hylocichla mustelina

Elgar, Mozart and Tchaikovsky at Grace Church On-the-hill

Cir­cum­stances have pre­vented me from attend­ing many live con­certs, recent­ly, so I jumped at the chance when Isaac White and his par­ents kind­ly invit­ed me to a con­cert at Grace Church On-the-hill, a hand­some Angli­can church built in 1912. I arrived ear­ly, so I spent an hour wan­der­ing around For­est Hill, in Suy­dam Park, Rel­mar Gar­dens, and the Cedar­vale ravine before meet­ing Isaac at the Sec­ond Cup. For­est Hill is like a small town embe­ded in the city, with its own lit­tle “main street” and a thick canopy of maples. In the crisp autumn air, the vil­lage seems like a Ray Brad­bury sto­ry re-writ­ten by Mar­garet Atwood. Among the stacks of pump­kins and the drift­ing red and gold fall­en leaves, the Angli­can, Unit­ed Church and Jew­ish ver­sions of Toron­to Respectabil­ity com­pete. No place could seem far­ther from the woes of the world. The local book store has a strange­ly mor­bid dis­play of high­ly lit­er­ary titles in its win­dow, with each title accom­pa­nied by a card explain­ing how the author died (did you know that Roland Barthes was run over by a laun­dry truck?). There are very com­fort­able pub­lic bench­es on the side­walks, a rar­ity in the rest of pen­ny-pinch­ing Toron­to. In the ravine, I saw a dog chas­ing a cat chas­ing a squir­rel chas­ing a leaf. Read more »

Monday, October 27, 2008 — Sense and Nonsense About “Socialism”

The word “social­ism” is used to mean vir­tu­al­ly any­thing imag­in­able, but if it means any­thing at all intel­li­gi­ble, it is “con­trol of pro­duc­tive enter­prise by the state”. More exact­ly, it means that the peo­ple who con­trol pro­duc­tion and the peo­ple who con­trol the state are the same peo­ple. Most states in human his­to­ry have been pre­dom­i­nant­ly social­ist. In most pre-mod­ern soci­eties, the state had direct con­trol of pro­duc­tion. Peas­ants worked land owned by an aris­toc­ra­cy, and that aris­toc­ra­cy con­sti­tut­ed state pow­er. Indus­tries were owned by the king or rel­a­tives of the king, by barons, by the Church, or by cor­po­rate bod­ies, all of which exer­cised the author­i­ty of the state. Read more »