This is not the magnificent main building of the R. C. Harris Water Treatment Plant in Toronto. It’s merely a pumphouse and maintenance building below the more famous main structure which is “opulent with marble entryways and vast halls filled with pools of water and filtration equipment”. Yet even this structure is grand, worthy of the self-taught genius who believed that civil engineering was a spiritual calling.
Category Archives: AD - Blog 2018
Seventh Meditation on Democracy [written October 1, 2008] REPUBLISHED
In the beginning years of this blog, I published a series of articles called “Meditations on Democracy and Dictatorship” which are still regularly read today, and have had some influence. They still elicit inquiries from remote corners of the globe. They are now buried in the back pages of the blog, so I’m moving them up the chronological counter so they can have another round of visibility, especially (I hope) with younger readers. I am re-posting them in their original sequence over part of 2018. Some references in these “meditations” will date them to 2007–2008, when they were written. But I will leave them un-retouched, though I may occasionally append some retrospective notes. Mostly, they deal with abstract issues that do not need updating.
A few days ago, I was in the subway, and I overheard a conversation about our current national election. Two boys who, from their appearance, could have been no further along in school than grade nine or ten, were discussing the televised debates between the leaders of the five major political parties. What struck me, as I listened in, was that the discussion was cogent and intelligent. One of the boys, who seemed the youngest, was particularly articulate, and his opinions were not the simple parroting of some adult he had heard, or the pursuit of a party line. In fact, his analysis of the debate showed keener observation and judgment than that of the professional commentators who dissected the debate after the broadcast. Read more »
Image of the month: Kel Tagelmust
A Tuareg noble of the Sahara, exactly as I remember such men. They are occasionally referred to as kel tagelmust (veiled people) because of the headgear and robe dyed with shimmering indigo. This garment is fine-tuned for the Sahara’s violent sandstorms, blistering sun, wild swings in temperature, and is designed to conserve precious body moisture. Perhaps it’s the inspiration for the “stillsuit” in Frank Herbert’s Dune. The seven tribal confederations of the Tuareg always seemed to me a much more plausible model for Herbert’s science fiction classic than the Badawi of Arabia, and the history of the Sahara and Maghrib have episodes that parallel the story of Dune.
Second Meditation on Dictatorship [written March 1, 2008] REPUBLISHED
In the beginning years of this blog, I published a series of articles called “Meditations on Democracy and Dictatorship” which are still regularly read today, and have had some influence. They still elicit inquiries from remote corners of the globe. They are now buried in the back pages of the blog, so I’m moving them up the chronological counter so they can have another round of visibility, especially (I hope) with younger readers. I am re-posting them in their original sequence over part of 2018. Some references in these “meditations” will date them to 2007–2008, when they were written. But I will leave them un-retouched, though I may occasionally append some retrospective notes. Mostly, they deal with abstract issues that do not need updating.
The argument behind this series of meditations is that aristocratic elites, whether they are dressed up in military uniforms, business suits, or the regalia of royalty, are identical in purpose and function. Differences between them are trivial and cosmetic, not structural. The term “dictatorship” applies equally to all places where an unelected gang of hoodlums rules over people and territory, whatever their supposed ideology or whatever style they chose to prance around in. I further contend that they are neither morally legitimate, nor “government” in the sense that democratically elected administrations are. Dictators are merely criminals, no different from the criminals that rob convenience stores or attack women in darkened car parks. The only difference is the amount of money they steal and the number of people they murder or maim.
Next, I have argued that rule by aristocracies is a constant danger to human society in any time and any place, independent of a society’s level of wealth, or available technology. I argue that there are no necessary or predestined “stages” in the organization of human society. Morally good and beneficial democratic social arrangements can be made at any time and in any place, by any group of people, large or small. Language, ethnicity, location, and degree of wealth are not structurally relevant to democratic practice, and democratic practice does not originate with, or “belong to” any particular cultural group. Similarly, dictatorship can occur in any human group. Immoral, diseased societies can be made at any time, in any place, by any group of people, large or small. Both possibilities always co-exist.
First Meditation on Dictatorship [written Thursday, February 7, 2008] REPUBLISHED
In the beginning years of this blog, I published a series of articles called “Meditations on Democracy and Dictatorship” which are still regularly read today, and have had some influence. They still elicit inquiries from remote corners of the globe. They are now buried in the back pages of the blog, so I’m moving them up the chronological counter so they can have another round of visibility, especially (I hope) with younger readers. I am re-posting them in their original sequence over part of 2018. Some references in these “meditations” will date them to 2007–2008, when they were written. But I will leave them un-retouched, though I may occasionally append some retrospective notes. Mostly, they deal with abstract issues that do not need updating.
Monument at Lidice.
The faces of the children are not generalized abstractions. They are carefully reconstructed from photographs to represent the individual children as they were in life.
We are so hamyd,
For-taxed and ramyd,
By these gentlery-men!
― The Wakefield Second Shepherds’ Play, c.1425–1450 [1]
We are men the same as they are:
Our members are as straight as theirs are,
Our bodies stand as high from the ground,
The pain we suffer’s as profound.
Our only need is courage now,
To pledge ourselves by solemn vow,
Our goods and persons to defend,
And stay together to this end…
— Robert Wace, Le roman de la Rou et des ducs de Normandie, 1160–70s [2]
On my return to Prague, last year, after tramping in Hungary and Transylvania, my friend Filip Marek took a day off for some more explorations of the Bohemian countryside. This turned out to be the most emotionally charged day in my travels, and I’ve delayed describing it because of its personal importance to me.
The landscape around Prague is not much different, at first glance, from that of Southern Ontario. It’s rich farmland, gently rolling hills, and patches of mixed forest similar to those around Toronto. Most of it was so pleasant that I couldn’t help replaying snatches of Dvořák, Smetana and Janáček in my head as the car rolled under the dappled sunlit trees, past fields and villages that seem to be both ancient and brand new at the same time. However, our quest was to extract something incongruously disturbing and tragic from Bohemia’s woods and streams.[3] We were going to see two places that do not loom large in the history books, but loom large in the kind of history that I am concerned with. The first was the Vojna Hard Labour Camp, in the forest near the village of Příbram, and the second was the site of Lidice, a village that no longer exists. Read more »
Sixth Meditation on Democracy [written January 10, 2008] REPUBLISHED
In the beginning years of this blog, I published a series of articles called “Meditations on Democracy and Dictatorship” which are still regularly read today, and have had some influence. They still elicit inquiries from remote corners of the globe. They are now buried in the back pages of the blog, so I’m moving them up the chronological counter so they can have another round of visibility, especially (I hope) with younger readers. I am re-posting them in their original sequence over part of 2018. Some references in these “meditations” will date them to 2007–2008, when they were written. But I will leave them un-retouched, though I may occasionally append some retrospective notes. Mostly, they deal with abstract issues that do not need updating.
For this Meditation on Democracy, the sixth in the series, I will undertake a critique of some currently dominant ideas about the role of democracy in human history, and attempt to provide a conceptual framework for looking at democracy in a different, more realistic way. This will mean that some of the ground covered in earlier meditations will be revisited. It will also draw on the collaborative work between myself and Prof. Steven Muhlberger, published in the Journal of World History, and on the World History of Democracy Website. I am exclusively responsible, however, for the views expressed in this series.
Fifth Meditation on Democracy [written Monday, November 5, 2007] REPUBLISHED
In the beginning years of this blog, I published a series of articles called “Meditations on Democracy and Dictatorship” which are still regularly read today, and have had some influence. They still elicit inquiries from remote corners of the globe. They are now buried in the back pages of the blog, so I’m moving them up the chronological counter so they can have another round of visibility, especially (I hope) with younger readers. I am re-posting them in their original sequence over part of 2018. Some references in these “meditations” will date them to 2007–2008, when they were written. But I will leave them un-retouched, though I may occasionally append some retrospective notes. Mostly, they deal with abstract issues that do not need updating.
It’s my contention that both hierarchical and egalitarian behaviour are equally “natural” to human beings. These two methods of interacting with others in a group have co-existed in all human societies, from the earliest stages of our evolution as a species. It is also my contention that, while there is a limited place for hierarchical thinking and behaviour in a good society, it is egalitarian thinking that has created civilization and morality. Any society that is dominated by hierarchy is essentially backward, self-destructive, and immoral. Read more »