17015. (Luc Laeven & Fabian Valencia) IMF Working Paper: Systemic Banking Crises, A New Database [report]

This a work­ing doc­u­ment issued this week by the IMF. It’s essen­tial­ly an inter­nal report by their sta­tis­ti­cians ana­lyz­ing all nation­al liq­uid­i­ty crises that have occurred since 1970. There are things worth call­ing atten­tion to, in it: There were 124 “sys­temic bank­ing crises” spread across dozens of coun­tries between 1970 and 2007. Almost every nation on Earth is in the list — except Cana­da. We’ve nev­er had one.

The aver­age fis­cal cost, net of recov­er­ies, asso­ci­at­ed with cri­sis man­age­ment can be sub­stan­tial, aver­ag­ing about 13.3 per­cent of GDP, and can be as high as 55.1 per­cent of GDP. Think of this in rela­tion to the U.S. econ­o­my! There is no end in sight to the line-up of pigs at the trough, and even if the final cost in the U.S. is well below the aver­age, it would make the amount so far look like pock­et change.

Out­put loss­es aver­aged about 20 per cent of GDP dur­ing the first four years of the cri­sis, and range from zero per cent to a high of 98 per cent of GDP. “There appears to be a neg­a­tive cor­re­la­tion between out­put loss­es and fis­cal costs, sug­gest­ing that the cost of a cri­sis is paid either through fis­cal costs or larg­er out­put loss­es. Fur­ther­more … even in the absence of sig­nif­i­cant gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tion, fis­cal loss­es may be large due to tax rev­enues for­gone because of high­er out­put losses.”

Leave a Comment