17175. (Ram Sharan Sharma) India’s Ancient Past

For a long time, the most read­er-friend­ly intro­duc­tion to the his­to­ry of ancient India (i.e. any­thing before the Gup­ta peri­od) has been the first vol­ume of Romi­la Tha­par’s His­to­ry of India. But that book was pub­lished back in 1966, and advances in archae­ol­o­gy and schol­ar­ship have out­dat­ed it. I would now rec­om­mend this book as a con­tem­po­rary sub­sti­tute. It’s a good place for some­one to start their read­ing on the sub­ject, though I sug­gest that they read it in con­junc­tion with Wikipedia entries on most of its main topics.

I have some prob­lems with Shar­ma’s work. He embraces some dubi­ous notions of “social evo­lu­tion”, he sees noth­ing of inter­est in the “trib­al” and non-Vedic or non-Dra­vid­i­an peo­ples of India except their inevitable con­ver­sion to “civ­i­liza­tion”, and he writes absolute­ly noth­ing about Indi­a’s inter­ac­tion with South­east Asia. This last stands in con­trast to his lengthy dis­cus­sions of Indi­an trade, polit­i­cal, and cul­tur­al inter­ac­tions with Cen­tral Asia, and even the Roman Empire. But impor­tant as these were, India nev­er export­ed much of its cul­ture to these areas, where­as in South­east Asia, Indi­an cul­ture was export­ed on a gigan­tic scale. Hin­du and Indo-Bud­dhist king­doms were set up in places as far as Viet­nam. Indi­a’s east­ward trade links were every bit, and per­haps more, impor­tant than its west­ward ones. Shar­ma hard­ly men­tions them. But despite these weak­ness­es, the book remains a good intro­duc­tion to a sub­ject with which every edu­cat­ed per­son in the world should have some basic familiarity.

Leave a Comment