17258. (Sattareh Farman Farmaian & Dona Munker) Daughter of Persia: A Woman’s Journey From Her Father’s Harem Through the Islamic Revolution

This auto­bi­og­ra­phy writ­ten (with some assis­tance) by an upper-class Iran­ian woman is both a pro­found­ly mov­ing per­son­al doc­u­ment and a per­fect intro­duc­tion to the his­to­ry of Iran in the 20th cen­tu­ry. Born in the harem of a mem­ber of the Qajar nobil­i­ty, Sattareh Far­man Farmi­an lived through the dis­so­lu­tion of the old King­dom, the reigns of the two Pahle­vi Shahs (the first, a sol­dier ran­dom­ly cho­sen and installed by the British, the sec­ond, installed by the CIA), and final­ly through the first stages of the Rev­o­lu­tion of the Aya­tol­lahs. Her cho­sen ambi­tion, to build a mod­ern school to train social work­ers to improve the lot of the aver­age Iran­ian, brought her into con­tact with the famous and pow­er­ful, but lit­tle per­son­al gain. Her loy­al­ties lay with the hand­ful of peo­ple who wished for a demo­c­ra­t­ic, con­sti­tu­tion­al monar­chy and a self-direct­ed mod­ern­iza­tion. These hopes were con­tin­u­al­ly dashed, as first one tyrant, then anoth­er, and anoth­er came into pow­er, most­ly through the inter­fer­ence of the Great Pow­ers. Her work put her in the posi­tion to observe much, and her nat­ur­al spunk and intel­li­gence gave depth to her obser­va­tions. Any­one bound by the pre-con­cep­tions of both Islam and Iran that pre­vail in the North Amer­i­can or Euro­pean press will find many sur­pris­es. The sub­tle­ty with which she com­mu­ni­cates her atti­tude toward the Unit­ed States, where she stud­ied, and whose soci­ety and cus­toms she deeply admired, but which installed and financed a bru­tal tyran­ny in her home­land, are par­tic­u­lar­ly fas­ci­nat­ing. Few books I’ve read have put across this par­tic­u­lar type of dilem­ma so strik­ing­ly. One brief pas­sage would shock a young read­er today. She met, and fell in love with a young Ben­gali study­ing film direct­ing in Los Ange­les. This was in 1948. The cou­ple went to L.A. City Hall to get a mar­riage license:

There, the clerk on duty refused to issue one until Arun pro­duced a pass­port to show that he was a for­eign nation­al and not, as the clerk sus­pect­ed from his dark com­plex­ion, an Amer­i­can Negro try­ing to mar­ry a white woman. Furi­ous and shak­en at this indig­ni­ty, I had to force myself to remem­ber that our hap­pi­ness would not depend on how big­ot­ed peo­ple judged our union.

Just as mov­ing are her mus­ings on the fail­ings of her own soci­ety, and on the trav­es­ty of her sin­cere faith when the mul­lahs came into pow­er. All is woven togeth­er by the sto­ry of her fam­i­ly. Her moth­er and father, dif­fer­ent in char­ac­ter, but both of them admirable and lov­ing in her eyes, are rarely absent from the nar­ra­tive. Ira­ni­ans, she says, trust nobody but their own fam­i­lies. She felt that Iran’s weak­ness was a short­fall of trust, in both pub­lic and pri­vate life, but ulti­mate­ly, it seems that her fam­i­ly was the only thing that she could rely on, or trust. So, while the book ends on a note of loss and fail­ure, it does not end in bitterness

Leave a Comment