(Örnek 2003) The Hittites

A fea­ture length doc­u­men­tary on the Hit­tites, nar­rat­ed by Jere­my Irons! I find it dif­fi­cult to believe that there’s a com­mer­cial mar­ket for this. I always liked the Hit­tites, and read what lit­tle was avail­able about them when I was a kid. But the name of this ancient civ­i­liza­tion usu­al­ly draws a blank stare, even among well-edu­cat­ed peo­ple. The Hit­tites carved out an empire that, for sev­er­al cen­turies, con­test­ed dom­i­nance of the Near East with Egypt and Baby­lon. It’s exis­tence remained unknown until 1806, when Hugo Winck­ler unearthed its roy­al archive of 10,000 tablets. These revealed chron­i­cles of a major pow­er, whose prin­ci­ple lan­guage was the ear­li­est record­ed form of Indo-Euro­pean. Their legal his­to­ry is par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ing, as it embod­ies the ear­li­est known exam­ples of record­ing case law along with records of amend­ments, with a clear under­stand­ing of law as evolving.

Much is made of the Indo-Euro­pean sta­tus of the Hit­tites in this doc­u­men­tary. Not sur­pris­ing, as the Hit­tite Empire was locat­ed in Ana­to­lia — what is now Turkey. That coun­try is engaged in an effort to enter the Euro­pean Union. Any­thing that sym­bol­i­cal­ly ties Turkey to Europe, and dis­tances it from the vio­lent Mid­dle East is empha­sized. There is cer­tain­ly no audi­ence in the gen­er­al pub­lic pant­i­ng to learn more about the Hit­tites, whose art is not very strik­ing, whose reli­gious pan­theon is sim­ply con­fus­ing, and who left only mild­ly cool-look­ing ruins. Some­body was inter­est­ed enough in this sym­bol­ism to lay out the cash nec­es­sary to pro­duce this doc­u­men­tary, and hire a pres­ti­gious actor to nar­rate it. But of course, this is all entire­ly irrel­e­vant to the Hit­tites, for whom the con­cepts of “Europe” and “Mid­dle East” were unknown. Until recent­ly, it was assumed that Indo-Euro­pean lan­guages orig­i­nat­ed in Europe (some­where north of the Black Sea), and that the Hit­tites were war­rior invaders of Ana­to­lia. But there is a grow­ing alter­na­tive view that Indo-Euro­pean lan­guages actu­al­ly orig­i­nat­ed in Ana­to­lia and spread in the oppo­site direc­tion. This is still a minor­i­ty view, but I incline to it. This view is not men­tioned in the documentary.

[… and now I’ve become dis­in­clined to the view. David W. Anthony’s The Horse, the Wheel, and Lan­guage ― How Bronze-Age Rid­ers from the Steppes shaped the Mod­ern World reviews all the old and new evi­dence on the issue, and con­vinc­ingly demol­ishes Renfrew’s the­ory of Ana­to­lian ori­gins for Indo-European.]

Comments are closed.