(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose

(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 1I’ve nev­er under­stand why this won­der­ful film had such a poor crit­i­cal recep­tion. Crit­ics com­plained that they could not fol­low the sto­ry. In fact, this medieval mys­tery, a lov­ing trib­ute to Conan Doyle’s Sher­lock Holmes sto­ries, by Umber­to Eco was very faith­ful­ly trans­lat­ed to the screen. Every­thing is per­fect­ly clear if the view­er actu­al­ly pays atten­tion (which I have not noticed film crit­ics being par­tic­u­lar­ly good at). All the per­for­mances are good, but Sean Con­nery, as the Frances­can detec­tive William of Baskerville, is superb. You can tell when an actor under­stands, not only the mean­ing and con­text of his lines, but their impli­ca­tions as well. Yes, the film is slow­ly paced, and requires some effort from the view­er to appre­ci­ate. But it has moments of great beau­ty, espe­cial­ly when William’s char­ac­ter is revealed in his inter­ac­tions with his novice, Adsel of Melk (Chris­t­ian Slater). I strong­ly rec­om­mend this film.

(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 2(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 3

(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 6(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 8(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 7(Annaud 1986) The Name of the Rose pic 5

Leave a Comment