Sunday, October 23, 2011 — Protests, Unreal and Real

I’ve passed by the “Occu­py Toron­to” camp­site a few times, this week. Nor­mal­ly, I’m not much impressed by polit­i­cal demon­stra­tions. In North Amer­i­ca, they have proven woe­ful­ly inef­fec­tu­al over the last gen­er­a­tion. The peo­ple who orga­nize them are usu­al­ly far more inter­est­ed in the pas­time of demon­strat­ing that in accom­plish­ing any goals. In fact, they are most­ly counter-pro­duc­tive, because the Pow­ers That Be long ago fig­ured out how to turn them to their own advan­tage. So I always wince when I see the usu­al band of scruffy teenagers wear­ing cir­cle-As, the aging hip­pies, the pre­dictable “polit­i­cal the­atre” stunts, the mean­ing­less slo­gans, and the drea­ry chants. Those in pow­er love these peo­ple, espe­cial­ly the self-styled “anar­chists,” because they re-inforce author­i­ty, rather than threat­en it. Noth­ing dis­cred­its real oppo­si­tion in the eyes of the pub­lic more effec­tive­ly than a few sec­onds of TV footage show­ing a teenag­er with his face paint­ed, scream­ing unin­tel­lige­able slo­gans. They see what appears to them to be a mob of brain­less pranx­ters. The issues can then be safe­ly buried by the media.

In fact, the police and politi­cians go out of their way to cul­ti­vate such antics. Dur­ing the G20 sum­mit, held last year in Toron­to, the Police and the RCMP planned, deployed, and orches­trat­ed a ram­page of import­ed Black Bloc “anar­chists” through the finan­cial dis­trict, break­ing win­dows. They plant­ed an emp­ty police car on the street, specif­i­cal­ly to be burned for the pho­to-op. Mean­while, the police went on their own ram­page, about a mile away from this, where the real demon­stra­tors were. They com­mit­ted some of the most obscene vio­la­tions of civ­il lib­er­ties in Canada’s his­to­ry, assault­ing and beat­ing peace­ful pro­tes­tors (and sev­er­al innocu­ous passers-by). It is an absolute cer­tain­ty that the police planned and orga­nized the van­dal­ism in the finan­cial dis­trict: There were lit­er­al­ly thou­sands of police stand­ing less than a block away, who were sup­pos­ed­ly unable to stop a hand­ful of teenagers from break­ing win­dows for an hour and a half. The loca­tion and intent to van­dal­ize was well-pub­li­cized ahead of time. The police had spent a week call­ing on every large office build­ing and telling thou­sands of office work­ers it was going to hap­pen. Every street and access was strict­ly con­trolled. For all intents and pur­pos­es, the Black Bloc were employ­ees of the Police. The press, of course remained com­plete­ly obe­di­ent to Con­ser­v­a­tive Polit­i­cal Cor­rect­ness. Not a word of doubt was cast on the absur­di­ty of the police claims. News sto­ries almost always implied that the pro­tes­tors at the Par­lia­ment Build­ings had been the ones doing the van­dal­ism, not the Black Bloc a mile away. The gen­er­al pub­lic saw noth­ing of the real protests ― only the end­less­ly repro­duced footage of the staged police car burn­ing. All this effec­tive­ly dis­tract­ed the pub­lic from the mon­strous cor­rup­tion of the rul­ing Con­ser­v­a­tive Gov­ern­ment, which wast­ed a bil­lion dol­lars on what was effec­tive­ly a frat par­ty for Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harper.

Harp­er could not have been more pleased to see the pro­fes­sion­al protest move­ment doing exact­ly what it is sup­posed to do. No doubt the Black Bloc van­dals were well salt­ed with RCMP agent-provo­ca­teurs, as this is a ven­er­a­ble, well-doc­u­ment­ed police tactic.

Nev­er­the­less, there is some­thing dif­fer­ent about the Occu­py move­ment. First of all, it’s a local off­shoot of the move­ment that has sud­dent­ly appeared in the Unit­ed States. That move­ment, start­ing with Occu­py Wall Street, was not orga­nized by the usu­al clowns. It appeared spon­ta­neous­ly, trig­gered by a hand­ful of tweets from peo­ple who were not stereo­typ­i­cal “activists”, and gath­ered strength through a process quite dif­fer­ent from that which cre­ates the stan­dard, for­mu­la­ic protests. The usu­al types have been par­tic­i­pat­ing, but also a much more diverse assort­ment of peo­ple. Even in Cana­da, where the protests have been a much tamer thing, they have been attend­ed by peo­ple who nor­mal­ly wouldn’t dream of join­ing a demon­stra­tion. One grand­moth­er was there because all her grand­chil­dren had gone through expen­sive edu­ca­tions, only to wind up work­ing in burg­er chains. She knew that some­thing has gone wrong with our sys­tem, but not what to do about it.

The Cana­di­an protests are a side-show. The real action is in the Unit­ed States, where the protests have been longer and big­ger than any­one in author­i­ty ever thought they would be, and the Con­ser­v­a­tive-con­trolled media have run out of ways to sneer at them. The usu­al objec­tion, that the demon­stra­tors are not putting for­ward any coher­ent “ide­ol­o­gy,” made by vir­tu­al­ly every pun­dit, reveals that it is those in pow­er who are dri­ven by an ide­ol­o­gy. Of course the demon­stra­tions have no con­sis­tent voice. They are not stage-man­aged farces, pro­pelled and direct­ed by strate­gists to achieve a spe­cif­ic goal (like the Tea Par­ty demon­stra­tions, which are financed by wealthy cor­po­rate inter­ests, and fol­low detailed instruc­tions from above). This fact is start­ing to break through the facade of the Con­ser­v­a­tive-con­trolled media in the Unit­ed States. Even some of those who ben­e­fit from the sta­tus quo are begin­ing to won­der if their world-view might be false, as this Paul Cam­pos piece in U.S.News demonstrates.

But Cam­pos and oth­ers like him have only an inkling of the depth of finan­cial and social dis­as­ter that the Unit­ed States has descend­ed into. The peo­ple who are show­ing up at the demon­stra­tions have more than an inkling, and that’s why they are there. They are sim­ply demon­strat­ing that they are tired of being lied to by the Con­ser­v­a­tive Lying Machine, and that they know per­fect­ly well that their coun­try has been sold out, sold away, and pil­laged by some­body. Wall Street is the obvi­ous address to come knock­ing at to demand some answers. Nobody believes that the pow­er rests in the Con­gress of the Republic.

Con­ser­v­a­tive con­trol of the media is so over­whelm­ing that a huge per­cent­age of Amer­i­cans, per­haps even a major­i­ty, have nev­er in their lives seen or heard any social or eco­nom­ic ideas oth­er than Con­ser­v­a­tive Polit­i­cal Cor­rect­ness. Yet the dete­ri­o­ra­tion of Amer­i­can life over the last decade has been so dra­mat­ic, that mil­lions are begin­ning to doubt that ortho­doxy. It was very inter­est­ing to see what hap­pened when an excen­tric bil­lion­aire, War­ren Buf­fet, pub­licly stat­ed that bil­lion­aires (includ­ing him­self) where being mol­ly­cod­dled by the tax sys­tem, and should pay a just share of tax­es. Fox­Prav­da went into a hys­ter­i­cal fren­zy, denounc­ing Buf­fet as a “social­ist” and talk­ing about “class war.” Repub­li­can politi­cians imme­di­ate­ly took up the “class war” slogan.

Now this was very inter­est­ing, because it con­sti­tutes one of the first big mis­cal­cu­la­tions by the Polit­i­cal Cor­rect­ness Machine. Amer­i­cans have been brought up from birth to believe that they do not have a “class soci­ety”, and that only for­eign-inspired rad­i­cals talk about “class war”. But, of course, the rich and pow­er­ful in the Unit­ed States do believe in a class soci­ety, and do believe in class war. The rich live in an entire­ly Marx­ist men­tal uni­verse. They have been wag­ing class war against the rest of us with unre­lent­ing fanati­cism, and they have most­ly been win­ning. But, like all fanat­ics, they are infu­ri­at­ed by any sign of oppo­si­tion, even if it is pure­ly sym­bol­ic. Every enthu­si­ast for aris­to­crat­ic rule, from Pla­to to Cas­tro to the Repub­li­can Nation­al Com­mit­tee, has the same atti­tude towards uppi­ty pro­les: Cet ani­mal est très méchant. Quand on l’at­taque il se défend. But few Amer­i­cans and Cana­di­ans have enough direct con­tact with the super-rich to know this. They assume that the rich believe in the “mer­i­toc­ra­cy” they ped­dle in their agit­prop. Talk of “class war” com­ing from the rich and Con­ser­v­a­tive politi­cians has cre­at­ed a dis­cor­dant jan­gle in the Con­ser­v­a­tive Nar­ra­tive. It’s not sur­pris­ing that one of the few voic­es of san­i­ty per­mit­ted on Amer­i­can tele­vi­sion, Jon Stewart’s show on the Com­e­dy Net­work, was able to skew­er it so effec­tive­ly and delightfully.

What the Con­ser­v­a­tive Polit­i­cal Cor­rect­ness Machine fears more than any­thing is that the pho­ny, con­trolled and manip­u­lat­ed “grass roots pop­ulism” that has been at their beck and call for a gen­er­a­tion might sud­den­ly be swamped and over­run by real pop­ulism. The real tra­di­tion of pop­ulism in Amer­i­ca, going back to its found­ing, has noth­ing to do with the cryp­to-com­mu­nist Con­ser­v­a­tive Ide­ol­o­gy ped­dled by Fox­Prav­da, or with cod­dling bil­lion­aires with tax breaks.

In Cana­da, it is unlike­ly that any­thing like this process will hap­pen. Con­ser­v­a­tive Ide­ol­o­gy does not have the same Sovi­et-style monop­oly here that it has in the U.S., though it is obvi­ous­ly influ­en­tial. Eco­nom­ic con­di­tions are wor­ri­some, but not the unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter they are in the U.S.. But what­ev­er hap­pens next among our neigh­bours is bound to affect us.

Leave a Comment