Tuesday, September 19, 2006 — Turfing Thaksin

The media, at least here in Cana­da, have been tak­en com­plete­ly by sur­prise by recent events in Thai­land. A fac­tion of the Thai mil­i­tary says it has over­thrown Prime Min­is­ter Thaksin Shi­nawa­tra. Pre­sum­ably, a long sequence of impor­tant events led up to this, but none of them attract­ed the atten­tion of jour­nal­ists in North Amer­i­ca. It might be wise for peo­ple here to pay a bit more atten­tion. At place of con­cen­trat­ing on dubi­ous and implau­si­ble attempts to bring democ­ra­cy to places like Afghanistan, we should be more con­cerned about its pre­car­i­ous posi­tion in rel­a­tive­ly impor­tant places like Thai­land. For Thai­land is an impor­tant coun­try, with tremen­dous eco­nom­ic poten­tial. It is unique in the region in that it nev­er suf­fered the expe­ri­ence of colo­nial­ism, though it has had to dance nim­bly between the pres­sures brought to bear on it by Britain and France (which had colonies on either side of it), by Japan, Amer­i­ca, and China.

Under Thaksin, Thai­land seems to have had a thin veneer of demo­c­ra­t­ic process, under which steamed a caul­dron of cor­rup­tion, manoeu­ver­ing by the mil­i­tary, and fac­tion­al dis­putes. It is not clear to me exact­ly who wants this sud­den mil­i­tary coup, and who oppos­es it. I sim­ply don’t know enough to have an opin­ion about Thaksin and his poli­cies. To tell the truth, I’m embar­rassed that I know next to noth­ing about this impor­tant country’s pol­i­tics. Thai­land is the kind of coun­try that should be able to find its inner strengths, and estab­lish a work­ing democ­ra­cy. There is no scar­ring lega­cy of colo­nial­ism, it is full of enter­pris­ing and well-edu­cat­ed peo­ple, it has a vig­or­ous cul­tur­al life, it has not been torn up by war. But it doesn’t seem to be able to make things work. I’m hop­ing that some Thai cor­re­spon­dents will give me some insights into this per­plex­ing situation.

Leave a Comment