15105. (Joseph-Charles Taché) Des provinces de l’Amérique du Nord et d’une union fédérale

The Sep­a­ratist move­ment in Québec has man­aged to train an entire gen­er­a­tion into think­ing that Québec’s entry into Con­fed­er­a­tion was some sort of con­spir­a­to­r­i­al swin­dle, but the truth of the mat­ter is that the very idea of Con­fed­er­a­tion orig­i­nat­ed in that province, and was large­ly pro­mot­ed by French Cana­di­an intel­lec­tu­als seek­ing a strat­e­gy to defend and pre­serve their cul­ture. The fact is that the prin­ci­ple threat to the lan­guage and dis­tinct cul­ture of French Cana­da was, in the 19th cen­tu­ry, the pos­si­bil­i­ty of the absorp­tion of Cana­da by the Unit­ed States. The first detailed and sys­tem­at­ic pro­pos­al for a Cana­di­an Con­fed­er­a­tion was this trea­tise by Taché, pub­lished in 1858. Taché was a doc­tor prac­tic­ing in the lum­ber camps of the wilder parts of the Gaspé penin­su­la, where he became enam­ored with abo­rig­i­nal cul­ture, and col­lect­ed folk­lore. His lat­er career in jour­nal­ism focused on the devel­op­ment of a strong and dis­tinct French Cana­di­an lit­er­a­ture, prefer­ably one that “ven­tured into the unknown.” As a mat­ter of prin­ci­ple, he refused to wear any arti­cle of cloth­ing not man­u­fac­tured in Cana­da. He was, in effect, a roman­tic nation­al­ist of the 19th cen­tu­ry mode. Not alto­geth­er pro­gres­sive, he pre­ferred a timid reform of the archa­ic sys­tem of seignio­r­i­al land tenure, rather than the com­plete abo­li­tion that the pub­lic clam­ored for. This lost him sup­port in his polit­i­cal career, though in oth­er issues he remained high­ly popular.

Taché’s the­sis was sim­ple. The col­lec­tion of British colonies that were scat­tered across the immense north­ern half of the con­ti­nent were each, alone, vul­ner­a­ble to be picked off and absorbed by the Unit­ed States, which was quick­ly becom­ing an eco­nom­ic and mil­i­tary pow­er. Britain was not like­ly, he rea­soned, to make any great effort to defend them. If even a few of the mar­itime colonies were absorbed by the U.S., the oth­ers would soon fol­low, and the chances of French Cana­di­an cul­ture sur­viv­ing unab­sorbed under Amer­i­can dom­i­na­tion were zilch. The only viable strat­e­gy was the cre­ation of a fed­er­at­ed union of all British North America’s colonies, what­ev­er their mix of French, Eng­lish, Gael­ic, or Native lan­guages, which could present a unit­ed front against U.S. “man­i­fest des­tiny”. He sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly exam­ined the polit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic, and social sit­u­a­tion in each of the colonies, and attempt­ed to demon­strate that each one stood to ben­e­fit from such a con­fed­er­a­tion. Con­fed­er­a­tion must be accom­pa­nied by a gar­gan­tu­an effort to devel­op a uni­fy­ing trans­porta­tion infra­struc­ture, and a large-scale pio­neer­ing of west­ern and north­ern lands. The argu­ment was backed up by his immense per­son­al knowl­edge of sta­tis­tics, pub­lic health, agri­cul­ture, and geog­ra­phy. Thus, Taché essen­tial­ly mapped out the next cen­tu­ry of Canada’s devel­op­ment as a nation. Des provinces de l’Amérique du Nord et d’une union fédérale was the most wide­ly read and influ­en­tial work lead­ing up to Con­fed­er­a­tion, and was essen­tial­ly the bible of the polit­i­cal activists who came to be known as the “fathers of Con­fed­er­a­tion”. It’s quite aston­ish­ing that this work has been forgotten.

Leave a Comment