(Wu 2000) Yingxiong Zheng Chengong [Hero Zheng Chengong / or / Sino-Dutch War 1661]

Zheng Cheng­gong as por­trayed by an unknown 17th cen­tu­ry artist …

… and by actor Zhao Wenzhou

Tai­wan is an island which was orig­i­nal­ly pop­u­lat­ed by Malayo-Poly­ne­sian peo­ples. Over a peri­od of about five hun­dred years, it absorbed set­tlers from the Chi­nese main­land, main­ly from the province of Fujian. The abo­rig­i­nal peo­ples where dis­placed and absorbed, and only two per­cent of Tai­wan’s pop­u­la­tion are now iden­ti­fied in this group. The bulk of the pop­u­la­tion speak a vari­ety of Min Chi­nese some­what sim­i­lar to that of Fujian. How­ev­er, Man­darin is the offi­cial lan­guage, taught in the schools, and nec­es­sary for all offi­cial and busi­ness pur­pos­es. The Dutch con­trolled the island between 1624 and 1662. Zheng Cheng­gong [鄭成功], or more cor­rect­ly Koxin­ga [國 姓爺] was a Ming loy­al­ist who defeat­ed the Dutch. He’s been adopt­ed as a hero by both the Bei­jing regime,to whom he rep­re­sents Chi­nese rule over Tai­wan, and by Tai­wanese nation­al­ists, for whom his rear-guard action against the Qing rep­re­sents a par­al­lel with Chi­ang’s Kai-shek. When Chi­ang’s Kuom­intang Par­ty was defeat­ed in 1949–50, he and his fol­low­ers retreat­ed to Tai­wan, which had only recent­ly been lib­er­at­ed from Japan. Curi­ous­ly, the Japan­ese rulers of Tai­wan also con­sid­ered Zheng a hero, because his moth­er was Japan­ese! Every­one seems to want a slice of Zheng. Any movie about him is, ipso-fac­to, bound to be polit­i­cal­ly motivated.

Now, any civ­i­lized and pro-demo­c­ra­t­ic view­er will not sym­pa­thize with the ide­o­log­i­cal moti­va­tion behind this pro­duc­tion. It is being used to pro­mote the Com­mu­nist Par­ty’s impe­ri­al­ist claims on Taiwan. 

Chi­ang’s Tai­wanese regime was dic­ta­to­r­i­al, but noth­ing close to the total­i­tar­i­an bru­tal­i­ty of Mao’s regime on the main­land. It pro­mul­gat­ed dra­mat­ic land reforms that ulti­mate­ly made the peo­ple of Tai­wan pros­per­ous. After Chi­ang died, demo­c­ra­t­ic reform­ers where able to slow­ly bring the coun­try into some­thing more resem­bling polit­i­cal moder­ni­ty. It has shaky and some­what cor­rupt demo­c­ra­t­ic insti­tu­tions, which may not be up to the stan­dard of bet­ter estab­lished democ­ra­cies, but are a mil­lion times more advanced than the prim­i­tive sav­agery of Com­mu­nist Par­ty rule on the main­land. In such a case, no claim by the Main­land dic­ta­tors to have any say what­so­ev­er in Tai­wanese affairs is legit­i­mate. The claim that the Com­mu­nist Par­ty “owns” Tai­wan is absurd and moral­ly offen­sive. The Tai­wanese peo­ple are the only peo­ple who have any legit­i­mate claims on Tai­wan. The Com­mu­nist Par­ty aris­to­crats in Bei­jing are mere­ly crim­i­nals. They don’t have the right to rule any­one. Any impe­ri­al­ist claims they make should right­ful­ly be treat­ed with con­tempt by all decent and civ­i­lized peo­ple. It will be right for the Tai­wanese peo­ple to join them­selves polit­i­cal­ly to the main­land only if the peo­ple of the main­land over­throw their Com­mu­nist aris­toc­ra­cy and estab­lish a pro­gres­sive society.

Leave a Comment