Category Archives: CM - Listening 2009 - Page 3

First-time listening for May, 2009

19922. (Syd Bar­rett) You Got It Now [rare Euro­pean boot­leg LP]
19923. (Thomas Tallis) In nomine I
19924. (Thomas Tallis) In nomine II
19925. (Thomas Tallis) A Solf­ing Song
19926. (Thomas Tallis) Sal­va­tor Mun­di [ver­sion for strings] Read more »

Elk Whistle: Still With Us / Wambdi Hokshida

Elk Whis­tle [aka Elk Whis­tle Singers] hale from Regi­na, Saskatchewan. This album would be classed as “pow pow con­tem­po­rary” rather than “tra­di­tion­al”, sung in the North­ern Style, with con­sid­er­able impro­vi­sa­tion­al free­dom. It’s an exam­ple of the fine mate­r­i­al being released by Saska­toon-based Tur­tle Island Music.Outstanding is the lead-in “Vic­to­ry Song”.

Sibelius Symphony #1

Akseli Gallen-Kallela's painting Symposium made in 1894. Symphony #1 was completed in 1899. From left: Akseli Gallen-Kallela, Oskar Merikanto, Robert Kajanus and Jean Sibelius. Kajanus would conduct the symphony.

Akseli Gallen-Kalle­la’s paint­ing Sym­po­sium made in 1894. Sym­pho­ny #1 was com­plet­ed in 1899. From left: Akseli Gallen-Kallela, Oskar Merikan­to, Robert Kajanus and Jean Sibelius. They were a clique of young bon vivants in Helsin­ki. Sibelius had already devel­oped his trade­mark scowl. Kajanus would con­duct the symphony.

Jean Sibelius’s Sym­pho­ny No. 1 in E minor, Opus 39 was writ­ten in 1898, and first per­formed the next year. Sibelius was aged 33, but he had been com­pos­ing seri­ous­ly for less than ten years. The sev­en sym­phonies con­sti­tute a cor­pus of work that begins with the con­ven­tion­al sym­phon­ic form and grad­u­al­ly evolves into an entire­ly dif­fer­ent approach. Stand­ing at the begin­ning of this process, the First is essen­tial­ly con­ven­tion­al in form. Its resem­blance to Tchaikovsky’s sym­phonies is so obvi­ous that most lis­ten­ers will spot it instant­ly, but it also dis­plays many of Sibelius’ dis­tinc­tive man­ner­isms. Read more »

Pluxus: Solid State

This Swedish elec­tron­ic group is yet anoth­er exam­ple of musi­cians delight­ing in “retro” elec­tron­ic sounds gen­er­at­ed by old equip­ment. The beeps, blips, and spacey sounds that embar­rassed the pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tion of elec­tron­i­cists now seem cool again, espe­cial­ly if they can be mixed with con­tem­po­rary sam­ples. Get­ting it to work — to make music that appeals to the ear, can be tricky. I would say that this album, released in 2006 and re-released in 2008, does so about half the time, notably with the skit­ter beat 2 (“Perm”), the strange­ly folky 3(“Bootstrap’) and 4 (“Kino­ton”) with the only vocals, which make a nice sequence, but less so with the remain­ing tracks.

First-time listening for April, 2009

19790. (Sergei Prokofiev) Piano Sonata #9 in C
19791. (Sergei Prokofiev) Piano Sonata #10 (frag­ment), Op.107
19792. (Griev­ous Angels) One Job Town
19793. (High Places) 03/07–09/07
19794. (Nel­ly Fur­ta­do) Folk­lore Read more »

Are You Experienced?

This was, believe it or not, the first album I ever owned. I grew up in a non-musi­cal fam­i­ly, and apart from what­ev­er turned up on the radio or tele­vi­sion, my expo­sure to music was very lim­it­ed. When I acquired a (kit-built) turntable and ampli­fi­er, I ran out and bought the first thing that appealed to me. Hav­ing noth­ing to go on, I picked Jimi Hen­drix’s Are You Expe­ri­enced? for no oth­er rea­son than that I liked the cov­er. Read more »

First-time listening for March, 2009

19688. (Fred­er­ick Delius) Dance Rhap­sody #1
19689. (Fred­er­ick Delius) The Song of the High Hills
19690. (Fred­er­ick Delius) Piano Pre­lude #1
19691. (Fred­er­ick Delius) Piano Pre­lude #2
19692. (Fred­er­ick Delius) Piano Pre­lude #3 Read more »

Birdy Nam Nam: Manual For Successful Rioting

This French turntab­list quar­tet is erod­ing the dis­tinc­tions between DJs, bands, and elec­tron­ic artists. They play live in clubs, mix­ing their own mate­r­i­al, or that of live musi­cians pressed onto vinyl, rather than the usu­al sam­ples, and restruc­ture much of what they cre­ate in the stu­dio. The result is inter­est­ing music, like­ly to appeal to an old­er crowd than most club-goers.

Antonín Dvořák: Symphony #1 in C m “The Bells of Zlonice”, Op.3, B.9

http _foto.turistika.cz_foto_32607_23790_full_43a2db_f_normalFile1-zlonice-dsc_0304

Antonín Dvořák lived in Zlonice, a small town in Bohemia, from 1853 to 1856. He must have been fond of this church’s bells.

I have an odd advan­tage over Dvořák. I’ve heard this sym­pho­ny, while he nev­er did. It was com­posed in 1865, when Dvořák was only 24. He sub­mit­ted the man­u­script to a com­pe­ti­tion in Ger­many, and the only copy dis­ap­peared, so he nev­er had a chance to hear it per­formed, or even to revise it. He dis­missed it as lost, and did not num­ber it among his com­po­si­tions. How­ev­er, in 1882, it was found by a Ger­man stu­dent in a sec­ond-hand shop in Leipzig, and kicked around until it final­ly resur­faced in 1923. It did not have a com­plete and unal­tered per­for­mance until 1973.

How does it sound? It’s pret­ty much Mendelssohn, or rather Mendelssohn when he sounds most like Beethoven. But it’s damn good for a cal­low youth’s first sym­pho­ny, and could stand on its own at any con­cert. Every now and then you hear a pre­mo­ni­tion of dis­tinc­tive­ly Dvořákian fea­tures. Many pas­sages are beau­ti­ful, or at least enter­tain­ing. It just does­n’t come togeth­er in a com­plete­ly sat­is­fy­ing way. The record­ing I have is con­duct­ed by Stephen Gun­zen­hauser, with the Czecho-Slo­vak Radio Sym­pho­ny Orches­tra, and was made in 1993 (only 27 days after the sep­a­ra­tion of the Czech and Slo­vak Republics, hence the odd­ly hyphen­at­ed name). It isn’t clear why it was called “The Bells of Zlonice” ― there are no bells in it, or bell-like pas­sages, and the phrase is nowhere on the score ― but Dvořák is reput­ed to have called it by that name in lat­er years. He lived in the small town of Zlonice for three years, and it has rather nice look­ing church. Per­haps its bells were par­tic­u­lar­ly fine. How much of this youth­ful work did he remem­ber? Could he play parts of it in his head, in old age, or did it sim­ply dis­olve into a vague impres­sion? Sad­ly, we get to indulge in the guilty plea­sure of lis­ten­ing to some per­fect­ly good Dvořák that Dvořák him­self nev­er heard. So let us at least hoist a pil­sner to his hon­our, when­ev­er we do so.

Zombie Zombie: Mad Dog

Scored for theremin, space echo RE201, toy piano, ARP­prodGX, Roland SH101, Prophet 600, 808 Roland, per­cus­sions, tape recorder, ana­log delay Ibanez UE305, toy piano and “scream­ing”, this album is an exer­cise in cre­at­ing a sense of uneasi­ness in the lis­ten­er. French elec­tron­ic musi­cians Eti­enne Jaumet and Cos­mic­Ne­man (from Her­man Dune) acknowl­edge the influ­ence of George Romero and John Car­pen­ter’s hor­ror films as much as the tra­di­tion­al elec­tron­ic gurus. I can’t say that Mad Dog held my rapt atten­tion all the time, but it suc­ceeds well enough in its aims to be worth a seri­ous lis­ten. This is a 2006 debut full-length release (after one 12“er). I don’t know if there has been any fol­low up since then.