Charles Ives: the “Universe Symphony”

Charles Ives on the Outside

and on the Inside

We’re an odd bunch, those of us who have the taste for the eccen­tric music of Charles Ives, the ama­teur com­pos­er and insur­ance sales­man who inde­pen­dent­ly devel­oped (ahead of every­one else) vir­tu­al­ly every musi­cal inno­va­tion of the 20th cen­tu­ry. Unrec­og­nized and unper­formed dur­ing most of his life­time, he com­posed bizarre con­coc­tions of polyry­thms, poly­tonal­i­ty, quar­ter tones, and tone clus­ters, includ­ing aleatoric ele­ments, long before any­one else dreamed of doing so. It was half a cen­tu­ry, for exam­ple, before his unbe­liev­ably com­plex fourth sym­pho­ny was per­formed, and it still sound­ed “futur­is­tic” to those who final­ly got to hear it. But, at the same time, Ives’ music was extreme­ly Amer­i­can, sat­u­rat­ed with pop­u­lar melody, brash­ness, and unabashed sen­ti­ment. It’s real affin­i­ty is not with the anti­sep­tic “art music” of the Euro­pean schools, but with the exper­i­men­tal jazz and rock music that lat­er emerged from the Amer­i­can chop suey.

Ives did not pro­duce much music after 1911. Few of his orches­tral works were ever per­formed, and his health was pre­car­i­ous. But he did work con­tin­u­ous­ly on a last sym­pho­ny, which was to devel­op and extend ideas in the fourth. This is the “Uni­verse Sym­pho­ny”, a work which fol­lows twen­ty simul­ta­ne­ous musi­cal lines; each mov­ing in a sep­a­rate meter, only coin­cid­ing on down­beats eight sec­onds apart. The ambi­tion and com­plex­i­ty of such a work beg­gars descrip­tion. It was meant to be a sort of sci­ence fic­tion­al, meta­phys­i­cal mag­num opus, some­thing like Olaf Sta­ple­don’s fic­tion in music. Its three move­ments are labeled: Part 1, “Past: For­ma­tion of the waters and moun­tains”, Part 2, “Present: Earth, evo­lu­tion in nature and human­i­ty”, Part 3, “Future: Heav­en, the rise of all to the Spir­i­tu­al”. Ives described it to friends as “a striv­ing to … trace with tonal imprints the vast­ness, the evo­lu­tion of all life … from the great roots of life to the spir­i­tu­al eter­ni­ties, from the great inknown to the great unknown.”

The work was not quite com­plet­ed: the man­u­script left var­i­ous seg­ments unassem­bled. It was not until the 1990’s that musi­cians worked up the nerve to assem­ble and per­form it. Three sep­a­rate recon­struc­tions were made, by David Gray Porter in 1993 (par­tial), Lar­ry Austin in 1994, and John­ny Rein­hard in 1996. The record­ings have always been too expen­sive for me to afford, though I’m a pret­ty devot­ed Ivesian. I recent­ly obtained a copy of the Lar­ry Austin ver­sion, and I saved it to be my first new lis­ten­ing item for 2009. From what I’ve read, the Austin and Rein­hard ver­sions are very dif­fer­ent. I have the impres­sion that the Rein­hard ver­sion is now gen­er­al­ly favoured. I can only quote this from a review by James H. North:

Austin’s ver­sion runs for 36 min­utes, Rein­hards for at least 65. The gap lies most­ly in Renhard’s “Pulse of the Cos­mos,” half an hour of pure per­cus­sion, much of it a slow­ly beat­ing sin­gle drum. In the Austin ver­sion, that music-“Life Pulse Pre­lude”- is over­lapped at the first Earth Chord, a rough equiv­a­lent of Reinhard’s “Earth Alone,” and con­tin­ues through­out the “Past” sec­tion; it is also faster, of which more below. Both divide the score into mul­ti­ple orches­tras: Austin calls then Heav­ens Orches­tras A, B, C and D; Life Pulse Per­cus­sion Orches­tra; Rock For­ma­tion Orches­tra; and Earth Chord Orches­tra. Rein­hard names the Earth, Heav­ens, and Pulse orches­tras. Both ver­sions of the Pulse music have com­plex rhyth­mic ele­ments we now asso­ciate with min­i­mal­ism, espe­cial­ly Steve Reich: instru­ments in the per­cus­sion orches­tra oper­ate at dif­fer­ent meters, com­ing into phase and then drift­ing out again. There are also micro­ton­al fea­tures, which can make the low brass seem bad­ly out of tune — in both record­ings – until one gets the drift of what is going on.

I’ll try to obtain the Rein­hard ver­sion to com­pare the two. But I must say that the Austin ver­sion in no way dis­ap­point­ed me. I lis­tened to the whole thing in a vir­tu­al trance. It seemed to me that the piece was start­ing from the point that the enig­mat­ic fourth sym­pho­ny end­ed, tak­ing Ives on a kind of 2001: A Space Odyssey jour­ney into alien land­scapes. Ive’s musi­cal jokes and pen­chant for quo­ta­tions were left behind, and what was left was a very seri­ous beau­ty, albeit the cold kind of beau­ty that a physi­cist can see in a mod­el of the first instant of cre­ation, or that I’ve expe­ri­enced walk­ing on the shores of the Arc­tic Ocean.

Leave a Comment