Monday, August 30, 2010 — The Game’s Afoot

There’s a rather long list of places I con­sid­er high pri­or­i­ties to vis­it. Near the top of that list is the Orkney Islands. Thanks to some for­tu­itous cir­cum­stances, I’ll be going there at the end of this month. The prin­ci­ple expense is cov­ered, so I will now only have to deal with the loss of income while I’m gone and costs while trav­el­ling. It will mean, no doubt, a few cold nights in my back­pack­ing tent, and some cre­ative skimp­ing, but I’m quite used to that sort of thing. My step already has a jaun­ty skip to it, like my cat does in antic­i­pa­tion of tuna. I know exact­ly the feel­ing I’ll have when the plane moves out onto the run­way: I’m On the Road Again. This is when I’m hap­pi­est, when the game’s afoot, and unguess­able adven­tures lie before me.

Why Orkney? None of my his­to­ri­an and archae­ol­o­gist friends need to ask. Less than twen­ty thou­sand Orca­di­ans inhab­it this clus­ter of windswept islands north of Scot­land, but few places on this plan­et have the remark­able depth of human remem­brance that these lit­tle islands have. By com­par­i­son, Rome is a trashy mod­ern wannabee, and Cana­da a fleet­ing rip­ple in the riv­er of time. The old­est evi­dence of human habi­ta­tion is from about 7000 BC. A Neolith­ic farm­stead dates from 3500 BC, and Skara Brae, Europe’s best-pre­served Neolith­ic set­tle­ment, dates from 3100 BC. A freak bur­ial in wind-blown sand kept this aston­ish­ing place, with sub­stan­tial inte­ri­or fur­nish­ings, almost intact. The islands are with­out tim­ber, so peo­ple have built in stone since the ear­li­est times. It is some­times joked that Orca­di­ans “left the Stone Age in the late 19th cen­tu­ry”. The impres­sive stone cir­cles, con­tem­po­rary with Stone­henge, are more recent items. The Iron Age left mas­sive stone tow­ers (brochs) and enig­mat­ic Pic­tish inscrip­tions. It’s impos­si­ble to put across the won­der these places hold for me. The ancient Greek explorer Pyth­eas of Mas­sil­ia [Πυθέας ὁ Μασσαλιώτης] seems to have vis­it­ed in the 4th Cen­tu­ry BC, record­ing the name of Orkas, and the Romans knew the arch­i­pel­ago as Orcades. The name is prob­a­bly Pic­tish, and has some­thing to do with pigs. The Vikings, who chased out the Picts and made the islands Norse in cul­ture and lan­guage, called it Orkne­yar. For cen­turies, the islands were part of a semi-inde­pen­dent Jarl­dom or Earl­dom that bal­anced pre­car­i­ous­ly between alle­giance to the Dano-Nor­we­gian and the Scot­tish Crowns. Scots Eng­lish grad­u­al­ly replaced the local Norn lan­guage, which died out in the 18th century. 

For three hun­dred years, the Orca­di­ans had an aston­ish­ing­ly inti­mate rela­tion­ship with the Cana­di­an Arc­tic and Sub­arc­tic. They inter­mar­ried with the native peo­ple of Cana­da, leav­ing a lega­cy of Orca­di­an sur­names among the Cree and Métis, who, to this day, pre­serve Orca­di­an folk music as a liv­ing tra­di­tion. That con­nec­tion is of spe­cial inter­est to me, since I’ve writ­ten on the sub­ject [forth­com­ing from Pal­grave Macmil­lan]. There are local archives of Hud­son Bay Com­pa­ny mate­r­i­al that I’m eager to plumb. 

But leav­ing aside the intel­lec­tu­al stim­u­lus that the trip will pro­vide, it’s des­per­ate­ly impor­tant to me to envig­o­rate my sens­es with fresh sounds, sights, smells, and tex­tures. Mod­ern Orkney will inter­est me as much as its ancient mon­u­ments, and, unlike most anti­quar­i­an vis­i­tors, I’m as eager to know the liv­ing as the dead. The worst mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tions of the past come from hav­ing too lit­tle feel­ing for the present, and too lit­tle curios­i­ty about the future. 

Leave a Comment