14643. (Gwynne Dyer) With Every Mistake

Gwynne Dyer is a Cana­dian jour­nal­ist (now based in the U.K.), and an expert on mil­i­tary sub­jects, who has had a glob­ally syn­di­cated col­umn for many years. I don’t always agree with him, but he is com­pe­tent, writes hon­estly, and doesn’t pre­var­i­cate. He’s gen­er­ally a voice of com­mon sense. Unfor­tu­nately, for the last decade, his col­umn hasn’t appeared in very many Cana­dian news­pa­pers. The major­ity of big Cana­dian papers have been under the con­trol of the malig­nant press bar­on, Con­rad Black, and his suc­ces­sor, in recent years. Dyer is per­sona non gra­ta. This book con­tains a selec­tion of the columns that most of us, here in his native land, have missed.

Dyer’s strong point is that, unlike most jour­nal­ists, he knows how the mil­i­tary works, how deci­sions get made in it, and what war real­ly involves. He also knows some­thing about the cul­ture and his­tory of the world in gen­eral. This puts him way ahead of most jour­nal­ists. He is weak­er when try­ing to sec­ond-guess the motives of politi­cians and the oli­garchs who wield real pow­er, a weak­ness which he very hon­estly admits. He calls atten­tion to the columns where he didn’t hit the mark.

Dyer offers no grand the­o­ret­i­cal frame­work for his analy­sis of geopo­lit­i­cal events. Unfor­tu­nately, he clings to the “left-right” for­mula of a “polit­i­cal spec­trum”, an idea that ren­ders most polit­i­cal dis­cus­sions use­less. Most jour­nal­ists share that fail­ing. How­ever, there are still many sol­id insights to be found in his work. I think the mis­fires orig­i­nate in a fal­lacy shared by most observers of Amer­i­can pol­i­tics. They are accus­tomed to think­ing that the poli­cies of the White House are designed to advance “Amer­i­can” inter­ests. Amer­i­can soci­ety is now so inward-look­ing and cut off from the world, that it seems log­i­cal to assume that the White House gang is mere­ly act­ing out tra­di­tional Amer­i­can xeno­pho­bia and arro­gance. I don’t believe that this is so. The gang that is now in con­trol is no more “Amer­i­can” than the Ostro­gothic Kings were “Romans”. Alar­ic the Goth may have strut­ted around the Forum in a toga, but he was not a Roman.

I believe that, with this admin­is­tra­tion, the Unit­ed States has come under the con­trol of peo­ple who are not Amer­i­cans. They may have been born in the Unit­ed States, but their loy­alty is not to their coun­try or to the Amer­i­can peo­ple. What they are loy­al to is a glob­al aris­toc­racy, a class of transna­tional bil­lion­aires, mid­dle-east­ern Sheiks, Euro­pean titled gen­try, ex-KGB gang­sters, and wealthy fam­i­lies that tran­scend all nation­al bor­ders. They live in a world of board­ing schools and num­bered bank accounts in Switzer­land, vil­las in Provence and cas­tles in Eng­land, pied-a-terre pent­houses in Man­hat­tan, shop­ping sprees at Har­rods, Dubai, and the Gin­za. Ide­o­log­i­cally, they see them­selves as the New British Empire. There is some Amer­i­can red-white-and-blue bunting scotch-taped onto their vision, but the the­o­reti­cians and schemers behind the Bush White House nev­er talk for very long before the glo­ries of the British Empire work their way into the conversation.

The British Empire, at its height, was not designed to make life pleas­ant for col­liery work­ers in Lan­cashire. It was designed to make life pleas­ant for “Eng­lish” Rajahs with giant palaces in Bor­neo and Mysore, and its tem­plate was the Moghul Empire, not Magna Car­ta. So it is today, with the Unit­ed States. Pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions of rulers of Amer­ica, how­ever self-serv­ing and rapa­cious, prob­a­bly thought of them­selves as pro­mot­ing Amer­i­can inter­ests. But the cur­rent bunch has embraced a new ide­ol­ogy. To them, the Amer­i­can peo­ple are noth­ing but native peasants.

Leave a Comment