Category Archives: BP - Reading 2006

The Mannheim School

The palace of the Elector of the Palatinate at Mannheim, where its resident orchestra was the heart of the "Mannheim School".

The palace of the Elec­tor of the Palati­nate at Mannheim, where its res­i­dent orches­tra was the heart of the “Mannheim School”.

Haydn and Mozart did not trans­form baroque music in a vac­uum. Change was in the air, and a num­ber of minor com­posers con­tributed to it. Among them were the men clus­tered in the court of the Elec­tor Carl Philipp, at Mannheim. The best musi­cians from across north­ern Europe were drawn there in the mid 1700’s. Com­posers of the Mannheim school intro­duced a num­ber of nov­el ideas into orches­tral music, such as a more inde­pen­dent role for wind instru­ments, adding the new­ly invent­ed clar­inet, and much more vari­able dynam­ics (the orches­tral crescen­do is a Mannheim inven­tion). Haydn picked up on these tech­niques. As a mat­ter of fact, his famous “Paris” sym­phonies were com­mis­sioned for the Mannheim orches­tra. I’m lis­ten­ing to a rep­re­sen­ta­tive selec­tion of Mannheim orches­tral music by the Cam­er­ata Bern, under the direc­tion of Thomas Füri: Die Mannheimer Schule, a 1980 box set from Archiv. It includes Franz Xaver Richter’s Sin­fo­nia in B‑flat, and his Con­certo for Flute and Orches­tra in E minor; Johann Stamitz’s Vio­lin Con­certo in C, and Orches­tral Trio in B‑flat, Op.1; Anton Filtz’s Vio­lin Con­certo in G; Ignaz Holzbauer’s Sin­fo­nia Con­cer­tante in A and Sin­fo­nia in E‑flat, Op.4; Chris­t­ian Cannabich’s Sin­fo­nia Con­cer­tante in C and Sin­fo­nia in B‑flat; and Lud­wig August LeBrun’s Oboe Con­certo in D minor. Johann Stamitz, the effec­tive founder of the school, stands out as the most imme­di­ately enjoy­able in this set. His superb vio­lin con­certo mer­its com­par­ison with Mozart’s. It’s loaded with vir­tu­os­ity, sim­plic­ity, free­dom and feel­ing, char­ac­ter­is­tics we asso­ciate with the next age. Tedious bas­so con­tinuo and for­mal orna­ment are nowhere to be heard in it. I was also charmed by Cannabich and LeBrun’s warm oboe con­certo. Oth­er Mannheim com­posers of note, not rep­re­sented in this set, were Franz Ignaz Beck, and Johann’s son Carl Stamitz.

Ursula K.LeGuin’s Earthsea books

07-04-04 READ Ursula K.LeGuin’s Earthsea booksI decid­ed to read through the well-known series of juve­nile fan­tasy that I nev­er got around to read­ing. Lequin’s Earth­sea books are wide­ly admired. Cer­tainly, the first vol­ume starts off well. The fan­tasy world is well-con­struct­ed, with the geog­ra­phy metic­u­lously thought out. Things move along quick­ly, because the prose style is very lean, with only the odd bit of con­crete, sen­sory descrip­tion thrown in judi­ciously. I would nev­er right that “thin” a prose myself, but LeGuin seems to be able to get away with it. The main char­ac­ter, Ged, is a bit of a stick of wood. I found myself pic­tur­ing him as Wes­ley Crush­er dressed up in a wiz­ard cloak. The drag­on is the best char­ac­ter. The sec­ond book was unfo­cused, the third was a good read, but recy­cled the themes of the first, and the fourth, writ­ten a full twen­ty-two years after the first, was down­right bor­ing. There was a fifth, pub­lished in 2001, which I haven’t even looked for. I would have to say that only the first vol­ume real­ly inspired me, and that it sup­plied all that I need­ed from the series.

READINGDECEMBER 2006

14856. (Robert Smith Thomp­son) Empires On the Pacif­ic ― World War II and the Strug­gle for
. . . . . the Mas­tery of Asia
14857. (F. Kaid Ben­field, Matthew D. Rai­mi & Don­ald D. T. Chen) Once There Were Greenfields
. . . . . ― How Urban Sprawl Is Under­min­ing America’s Envi­ron­ment, Econ­o­my and Social Fabric

14858. (Andre Dubus III) House of Sand and Fog
14859. (Mary Frances Cusack) An Illus­trat­ed His­to­ry of Ire­land From AD 400 to !800
14860. (Nicholas Mey­er) The Sev­en-Per­cent Solution
14861. (Ian Fin­lay) Columba
Read more »

14856. (Robert Smith Thompson) Empires On the Pacific ― World War II and the Struggle for the Mastery of Asia

This out­line of the mil­i­tary and diplo­matic his­tory of the Pacif­ic the­atre of WWII is of mixed val­ue. In describ­ing the oper­a­tions of Amer­i­can forces, it is quite good. Thomp­son describes the main bat­tles in lit­tle vignettes, which are well-cho­sen and well-writ­ten. But some of the book touch­es on Chi­na, and in these parts, he depends heav­ily on the dis­cred­ited and gen­er­ally worth­less reportage of Edgar Snow, per­pet­u­at­ing myths man­u­fac­tured by the Com­mu­nist Par­ty. Thomp­son believes, like many peo­ple once did, that if only Wash­ing­ton had struck a deal with Mao, they would have built a fruit­ful rela­tion­ship with him. This is non­sense. Thomp­son is quite right that Gen­eral Stillwell’s eval­u­a­tion of Chi­ang Kaishek was basi­cally cor­rect. Chi­ang was insuf­fer­ably cor­rupt, and made lit­tle seri­ous effort to resist the Japan­ese, doing only the bare min­i­mum that would ensure the flow of aid. How­ever, if the Nation­al­ists under Chi­ang did lit­tle to fight the Japan­ese, the Com­mu­nists under Mao did absolute­ly noth­ing. Mao not only had no inter­est in fight­ing the Japan­ese, he had been hop­ing the Japan­ese would destroy Chi­ang and occu­py a large part of the coun­try, which would leave the rest of the coun­try in his hands and force Stal­in to acknowl­edge his per­ma­nent pow­er. In fact, the Com­mu­nists’ only known armed exchange with the Japan­ese was an acci­den­tal skir­mish, which aroused Mao’s fury. He would have entered into a pact with the Japan­ese the sec­ond it was possible.

READINGNOVEMBER 2006

14835. (Ken­neth Hsien-yung Pai [Bái Xiānyǒng] ) Crys­tal Boys
14836. (Alfred J. Andrea) The Cru­sades in the Con­text of World His­to­ry [arti­cle]
14837. (Iota Syk­ka) Unique Myce­naean Suit of Armor Due for Con­ser­va­tion [arti­cle]
14838. (Cesare, march­ese di Bec­ca­ria-Bone­sana) Des délits et des peines, tra­duc­tion nouvelle
. . . . . et seule complète, accompagnée de notes his­toriques et cri­tiques sur la législation
. . . . . crim­inelle anci­enne et mod­erne, le secret, les agens provo­ca­teurs, etc.

14839. (François-Marie Arou­et, dit Voltaire) Com­men­taire sur le livre Des délits et des
. . . . . peines de César de Beccaria
14840. (Joseph Michel Antoine Ser­van) Dis­cours sur La jus­tice crim­inelle, 1766, avec des notes
Read more »

14851. (Stanley Elkin) The Living End

Stanley Elkin

Stan­ley Elkin

Stan­ley Elkin was nev­er exact­ly pop­u­lar, but his dark tra­gi-com­ic fan­tasies appealed to an off-beat minor­ity. The Liv­ing End, writ­ten in 1979, is still very read­able, though hard to describe. It man­ages to include a jour­ney through heav­en and hell where there real­ly are pearly gates, and you are real­ly damned to eter­nal tor­ment because you took the Lord’s name in vein, and a war between Min­neapo­lis and St. Paul [“Let me tell you some­thing, gen­tle­men. A St. Paul baby ain’t got no busi­ness on the point of a Min­neapo­lis bay­o­net.”] Elkin’s twist­ed humour is not for every­one. Does any­one read him, nowa­days? So many inter­est­ing and unique writ­ers end up lost in the shuf­fle of time.

14843. (Nicholas Ostler) Empires of the Word, A Language History of the World

The title of this book is a lit­tle mis­lead­ing. Only a few of the world’s thou­sands of lan­guages are even men­tioned in it. What the book is real­ly about is the suc­cess­ful Lin­gua fran­cas, the lan­guages that achieved wide­spread usage through con­quest, trade, or cul­tural pres­tige. So his atten­tion focus­es on Akka­dian, Ara­maic, Greek, San­skrit, Chi­nese, Malay, Latin, Por­tuguese, Span­ish, French, Russ­ian, and Eng­lish, each of which expand­ed far beyond their eth­nic pud­dles. On this top­ic, it is a fine intro­duc­tion to the gen­eral read­er. Any­one who stud­ies world his­tory should read it. Ostler is at his best when talk­ing about San­skrit, which he obvi­ously is par­tic­u­larly attract­ed to. His expla­na­tion of why San­skrit is so rich in puns, for exam­ple, is very inter­est­ing. Else­where, I’ve writ­ten about the sophis­ti­ca­tion of the San­skrit gram­mar­ian Pani­ni. Ostler gives a clear expla­na­tion of why his work is so remark­able. Ostler is not, like many peo­ple who have writ­ten on the top­ic, unthink­ingly tri­umphant about the future dom­i­nance of Eng­lish as a world lan­guage. In the book, he shows exact­ly how a “uni­ver­sal” lan­guage can evap­o­rate its own util­ity and pop­u­lar­ity. Per­son­ally, I sus­pect that Eng­lish will retain its role as the “Latin” of this cen­tury, and that this will in no way inhib­it the renais­sance of local ver­nac­u­lars and new region­al play­ers. We are enter­ing a new age of lin­guis­tic wealth.

14835. (Kenneth Hsien-yung Pai [Bái Xiānyǒng] ) Crystal Boys

Bai Xiany­ong is said to be the best styl­ist among today’s Tai­wanese writ­ers, and among the best writ­ing in Chi­nese today. This is not some­thing I’m in a posi­tion to judge. This nov­el trans­lates well, part­ly because the sub­ject mat­ter, the sub­cul­ture of gay hus­tlers in Taipei, is eas­ily com­pared to sim­i­lar set­tings in Europe or North Amer­ica. Chi­nese soci­ety, for most of the thou­sands of years of its his­tory, was not infect­ed by the bar­baric homo­pho­bia that obsessed Chris­t­ian Europe. Unfor­tu­nately, Euro­pean cul­tural norms, and of course the vicious gay-hatred of Com­mu­nism on the main­land, have had their influ­ence, and today the gay sub­cul­ture of Tai­wan occu­pies much the same social posi­tion that it does in Amer­ica. Bai’s hus­tler char­ac­ters could as eas­ily be found in Toronto’s Church and Welles­ley vil­lage, or in West Hol­ly­wood. The per­fume of Chi­nese imagery, of jade and plum blos­soms and so on, makes it seem a bit dif­fer­ent. So do the numer­ous ref­er­ences to con­tem­po­rary Chi­nese pop cul­ture. Is it a good nov­el? Yes. The char­ac­ters seem real, and you care about what hap­pens to them. I rec­om­mend it.

READINGOCTOBER 2006

14797. (Akdi Ros­tag­no, Julian Beck & Judith Mali­na) We, The Liv­ing Theatre
14798. (Will Bunch) The Media Is Help­ing Bush Scare the Pop­u­lace [arti­cle]
14798. (Lisa Finnegan) No Ques­tions Asked – News Cov­er­age Since 9/11 [intro­duc­tion and chapter
. . . . . out­lines of book to be pub­lished in Decem­ber, 2006]

14799. (Robert Bowring) Chi­na’s grow­ing might and the spir­it of Zheng He [arti­cle]
14800. (Jon George) Zoot­suit Black Read more »

Friday, October27, 2006 — Tread Softly

I’ve nev­er been a big fan of William But­ler Yeats — from that peri­od, Ger­ard Man­ley Hop­kins is more to my taste — but this short poem pleas­es me. If you have ever been qui­et­ly, unselfish­ly and vul­ner­a­bly in love with anoth­er per­son, you will know that he has cap­tured the sen­sa­tion exactly.

He wish­es for the cloths of heaven
Had I the heav­ens’ embroi­dered cloths,
Enwrought with gold­en and sil­ver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half-light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread soft­ly, because you tread on my dreams.

No tedious cycles of his­to­ry, slough­ing beasts, or celtic blar­ney, here. Appar­ent­ly, Yeats occa­sion­al­ly stepped off the cos­mic mer­ry-go-round to feel some­thing in an ordi­nary way. Love is not a top­ic that poets of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry han­dled well. Too plebian, I guess. And it takes courage.

[Adden­dum: A read­er informs me that Yeat’s poem is actu­ally reli­gious in nature, and not about love at all. He explained the ref­er­ences in the phras­ing that iden­tify it as actu­ally being about con­tri­tion, repen­tance and “hid­den evil”. *sigh* Why are poets attract­ed to such tedious non­sense? I guess it was to good to be true to think a twen­ti­eth cen­tury poet would be will­ing to address an issue that real­ly mat­ters, and requires real thought, rather than the end­less re-arrange­ment of inane reli­gious twaddle.]