14746. (Elliott Leyton) Hunting Humans

This is the sem­i­nal work on the anthro­pol­ogy and soci­ol­ogy of ser­ial killing. I read it in con­junc­tion with an NFB doc­u­men­tary film “The Man Who Stud­ies Mur­der”, which puts a face to the voice of the book. Ley­ton is a coun­try boy from small-town Saskatchewan (who looks and sounds dis­tinctly Metis, though I can’t say for sure that he is) and now lives in New­found­land. New­found­land is rur­al, poor by North Amer­i­can stan­dards, and vir­tu­ally every house has a gun. Eco­nom­i­cally, it’s the Cana­dian equiv­a­lent of Arkansas. But it has one of the low­est mur­der rates in the world. In the film, Ley­ton dis­cusses the rea­sons why he con­sid­ers cul­tural choic­es and mores the prin­ci­pal deter­mi­nant of mur­der rates and styles of mur­der, often using his home as a laboratory.

The book on ser­ial and mass killers, deal­ing with the “clas­sic” cas­es, attempts to get beyond the kind of unver­i­fi­able psy­chi­atric spec­u­la­tions that dom­i­nated the issue before Ley­ton came on the scene. As he demon­strates, psy­chi­a­try has been of lit­tle use in under­stand­ing the phe­nom­e­non. He shows the fun­da­men­tal sim­i­lar­i­ties in most ser­ial killings, and does his best to deflate the non­sense gen­er­ated by Thomas Harris’s “Han­ni­bal Lecter” fan­tasies. Ser­ial killers are invari­ably pathet­ic, inef­fec­tive losers, usu­ally pret­ty dumb.…. nev­er the suave super­ge­niuses of fic­tion. Ley­ton rejects bio­log­i­cal and psy­chi­atric expla­na­tions in favour of a cul­tural one, and argues it per­sua­sively. He may not have the last word on this issue, but his opin­ions are more worth read­ing than most. He is also a wit­ty and enter­tain­ing writer and from the evi­dence of the film, has the same qual­i­ties in person.

Leave a Comment