Tuesday, May 1, 2007 — Crown and Parliament

I heard some good music (Ivo Evans Band; The Enor­mous Sizes) at a pub called The End, in a not-very-pros­per­ous part of Cardiff not far from the Uni­ver­si­ty. I felt more com­fort­able there than at the Pen & Wig, the reput­ed hang­out of Sci­ence Fic­tion fans in the city. I popped into that one, briefly, but it looked a bit expen­sive for me, and no one I saw gave off the tell-tale signs of SF fan­dom. I felt more com­fort­able at The End, where I could afford a cou­ple of pints, and I seemed to fit in with the clientele.

Cosburn Street, Cardiff

Cos­burn Street, Cardiff

Most homes in the U.K. seem to be too cramped to do much social­iz­ing in, so the pubs pro­vide a sort of com­mu­nal liv­ing room, where almost all social life is con­duct­ed. Unlike the noisy and uncom­fort­able bars in Toron­to, they pro­vide phys­i­cal com­fort, much like any domes­tic liv­ing room. They are not mere booz­ing joints, or high pres­sure hunt­ing grounds for sex­u­al part­ners, as they seem to be back home.

Nev­er­the­less, by suck­ing up a lot of cash, they con­tribute to one of the fun­da­men­tal prob­lems that faces the human race: the ten­den­cy of every soci­ety to bleed away any kind of sur­plus that might be accu­mu­lat­ed by the aver­age per­son, so that fun­da­men­tal improve­ments in lifestyle and secu­ri­ty are dif­fi­cult to achieve. No mat­ter how many sky­scrap­ers rise on the hori­zon, the aver­age per­son makes lit­tle eco­nom­ic head­way. High­er salaries are invari­ably accom­pa­nied by high­er accom­mo­da­tion costs, and the only real improve­ment seems to be in the avail­abil­i­ty of some con­sumer goods, or more choic­es in entertainment.

Com­pared to me, the Bol­las (my hosts in Cardiff) have huge amounts of mon­ey pass­ing through their hands, but the small coun­cil house they live in pro­vides no bet­ter hous­ing than my apart­ment in Toron­to. The coun­cil rates they pay for this very mod­est row-house swal­low most of their income.

More than a cen­tu­ry ago, in North Amer­i­ca, the inven­tion of bal­loon-frame con­struc­tion cut the cost of hous­ing in half. Plen­ty of open land, and the legal frame­work of home­steading meant that huge amounts of pub­lic and pri­vate infra­struc­ture could be built, and at the same time, per­son­al effort could be trans­formed into sav­ings, or per­son­al invest­ment cap­i­tal. This trig­gered the most phe­nom­e­nal improve­ment in liv­ing stan­dards in human his­to­ry. For sev­er­al gen­er­a­tions, the gap between the lifestyle of Cana­di­ans, Amer­i­cans, Aus­tralians and New Zealan­ders one the once hand, and the rest of the world was obvi­ous and dra­mat­ic. The image of these places as gold­en lands of oppor­tu­ni­ty for the com­mon man and woman was fueled by this ben­e­fi­cial ratio, as well as by sub­stan­tial gains in polit­i­cal democ­ra­cy, and the reduc­tion of class bar­ri­ers. Even the Great Depres­sion made only a tem­po­rary dent in this gen­er­al trend of improve­ment. After World War II, the gap was huge.

A friend of mine described the sit­u­a­tion of his par­ents, who were retirees in a small Cana­di­an town. His father, with min­i­mal edu­ca­tion, had worked at a sim­ple fac­to­ry job, the sort of work where you are respon­si­ble for mon­i­tor­ing some gauges and doing some rou­tine pro­ce­dures. With this mod­est effort, he was able to build a very nice house (for which, on retire­ment, he was pay­ing off a mort­gage of a few dol­lars a month), send his son to uni­ver­si­ty, and pro­vide for a com­fort­able life in retire­ment. He had great trou­ble under­stand­ing why his son, bet­ter edu­cat­ed, and work­ing as a pro­fes­sion­al engi­neer, had trou­ble mak­ing ends meet. This pro­found con­trast became nor­mal after the 1980, when the pro­gres­sive leap for­ward of North Amer­i­can life began to run out of steam. Cana­da and the Unit­ed States now oper­ate more or less like the rest of the world, with the aver­age per­son drained of what­ev­er income they earn at the rate it is made, most­ly to pro­vide roofs over heads. Con­sumer cred­it pro­vides most of the “extras”, depend­ing on antic­i­pat­ed improve­ments that may not come. The sta­tis­tics tell a sad sto­ry: the aver­age Cana­di­an or Amer­i­can works longer hours now than a gen­er­a­tion ago, and rather than accu­mu­lat­ing sav­ings, accu­mu­lates debts. This was the essence of the “Rea­gan Rev­o­lu­tion,” which was, like most “rev­o­lu­tions” basi­cal­ly an empow­er­ing of the rich by dis-empow­er­ing every­one else.

Where has the mon­ey gone? In the Unit­ed States, it has been squan­dered on a vast mil­i­tary estab­lish­ment, which throws it away in immense­ly destruc­tive and pur­pose­less impe­ri­al­ist wars, and on the build­ing up of an Old-Euro­pean-style aris­toc­ra­cy. This is a process that began in earnest with the Viet­nam War, and the growth of the pro­found­ly un-Amer­i­can cult of the Presidency.

Amer­i­ca’s lev­el of per­son­al and pub­lic debt is now so high that it is dif­fi­cult to imag­ine any degree of eco­nom­ic dynamism that could ever pay it off. Amer­i­ca is essen­tial­ly bank­rupt, liv­ing for the moment on cred­it that will, soon­er or lat­er, be cut off. Yet, at the same time, there is a grow­ing lay­er of per­ma­nent­ly priv­i­leged wealth that lives in unbe­liev­able lux­u­ry, with lit­tle pro­duc­tiv­i­ty to jus­ti­fy it. In short, Amer­i­ca has become Vic­to­ri­an Eng­land, and it won’t be long before Amer­i­cans are cring­ing before their “bet­ters”, doff­ing their caps, and mur­mur­ing “begin’ your par­don, Squire” to an assort­ment of aris­to­crat­ic jack­ass­es. This, no doubt, will be dressed up in the lan­guage of the “mar­ket econ­o­my” to which it is a fun­da­men­tal con­tra­dic­tion and violation.

Leave a Comment