16197. (Frances Stonor Saunders) The Devil’s Broker ― Seeking Gold, God, and Glory in 14th Century Italy

This is a very well-writ­ten study of the role of the Eng­lish con­dot­tieri who were the Hal­ibur­ton Gang of four­teenth cen­tury Italy. It focus­es on the char­ac­ter of John Hawk­wood, a minor Eng­lish knight who rose to lead­er­ship among the mer­ce­nary armies that were cast loose on France and Italy, when the Hun­dred Years War entered a lull. Saun­ders’ prose is excel­lent, and evoca­tive, her grasp of the evi­dence is strong, and she has a com­mon-sense vision of the real life behind the documents.

Com­mon action against these for­mi­da­ble fight­ing machines could nev­er be achieved as long as local inter­est dom­i­nated Ital­ian pol­i­tics, as Mat­teo Vil­lani under­stood. “Although both the tyrants and the pop­u­lar gov­ern­ments of Italy hat­ed the [com­pa­nies],” he wrote, “so great was the divi­sion into fac­tions and the rival­ry between republics and tyrants that each pre­ferred to spend mon­ey on hir­ing com­pa­nies rather than fight­ing them.” The mere exis­tence of a sup­ply of mer­ce­nar­ies cre­ated a demand for their ser­vices. Gov­ern­ments employed them sim­ply because they were there, and because, if they didn’t, rival gov­ern­ments would. It had become “a ruinous­ly expen­sive game of see-saw,” in which the val­ue of the com­pa­nies was the pure­ly neg­a­tive one of main­tain­ing the bal­ance of mil­i­tary pow­er between the cities. Again and again, as the free­lance depre­da­tions became intol­er­a­ble, plans for form­ing a league against the com­pa­nies were put for­ward, but each time the ambi­tion or fear of some city would ruin the attempt, and the scram­ble for sol­diers would be repeat­ed. As one his­to­rian writes, “The leagues became sources of intrigue and exclu­sion, cyn­i­cal devices, serv­ing only to deep­en mutu­al antipathies.” In any case, it would have been nec­es­sary to hire more sol­diers to dri­ve them out, thus exac­er­bat­ing the prob­lem. And it was use­less for the popes to cling to their res­o­lu­tion of induc­ing the adven­tur­ers to go on cru­sade as long as they remained one of their largest employ­ers. (p.85–86)

We are talk­ing about medieval Europe, here, but the process is inher­ent to any place where you have trained war­riors detached from loy­al­ties to home and hearth. This, in a nut­shell, I would pro­pose, describes the process by which the ancient world’s vil­lages and ear­ly cities acquired kings and aris­toc­ra­cies. I sus­pect that, far from being the prod­uct of an inter­nal “evo­lu­tion into com­plex­ity”, the rule of aris­toc­ra­cies was essen­tially an exter­nal pre­da­tion that ear­ly vil­lage and town soci­eties were unable to fend off, for much the same rea­sons that con­dot­tieri were effec­tive in this medieval context.

Leave a Comment