Category Archives: A - BLOG - Page 46

Friday, May 4, 2007 — Whitechapel; Bookshop; Battersea

These are some notes on ram­bling in the U.K. that did­n’t make it into pre­vi­ous postings:

Bat­te­sea Pow­er Station

07-05-04 BLOG Friday, May 4, 2007 — Whitechapel; Bookshop; Battersea pic 3In Lon­don, I chanced to come near the mas­sive bulk of the old Bat­tersea Pow­er Sta­tion. This huge struc­ture is famil­iar to any­one who has a copy of Pink Floy­d’s Ani­mals, where it’s used in the cov­er art. Now it’s in the process of being torn down. For once, I deeply regret­ted not hav­ing a cam­era with me. I will not be able to find any pho­tographs of it in this par­tic­u­lar stage of demo­li­tion, where it looks like a diplodocus, supine and par­tial­ly dis­mem­bered by a T‑rex. Read more »

Thursday, May 3, 2007 — Go Down, Moses, Way Down In Egypt Land…

There’s a time in every jour­ney when things don’t go well. Usu­al­ly, some small event presages the com­ing trou­ble, as comets were said to fore­warn of the Black Death.

Not far from the spot where the Wiltshire Wind undid my plans...the ancient artificial mound known as Silbury Hill is in view.

Not far from the spot where the Wilt­shire Wind undid my plans…the ancient arti­fi­cial mound known as Sil­bury Hill is in view.

In my case, the omen occurred back in Wilt­shire. I was afoot on the Marl­bor­ough Downs, trekking between Sil­bury Hill and a clus­ter of minor bur­ial mounds on a hill­top, well away from the road. I chanced upon a spring, and desir­ing some cof­fee to brace me in the cold wind, I made a tiny smudge fire (con­tained in my own steel pan, to pre­vent any scar­ring of the land). I boiled a small amount of water, and poured it through a piece of fil­ter paper that wrapped a lump of Ital­ian espres­so, as I had done many times before in the Cana­di­an bush. It’s a crude sys­tem, but it pro­vides an accept­able cup of cof­fee. When the process was fin­ished, I lift­ed up the sod­den fil­ter in one hand, and it was torn from my fin­gers by a sud­den gust of wind. The mess land­ed on my open note­book. About a dozen pages were soaked with hot water and cof­fee grounds. As I attempt­ed to remove them from the binder, yet anoth­er gust of wind tore the sog­gy sheets from the binder and scat­tered them. They were, I believed, only a few scrib­bled sketch­es, of lit­tle impor­tance. Read more »

Wednesday, May 2, 2007 — The Golden Boy of Pye

Gog and Magog

Gog and Magog

Back in Lon­don (or Llundain, in Welsh), and I head­ed back to Cam­den Town, hop­ing to get a spot in the same “cheap” (by Lon­don stan­dards) hos­tel. This proved suc­cess­ful, and I left my pack in stor­age while I spent anoth­er day explor­ing the city.

I had deter­mined that the only cost-effec­tive way of trav­el­ing in Lon­don is to buy a day pass for the bus sys­tem, and stay out of the cost­ly Under­ground entire­ly. Bus­es move slow­ly, but once you fig­ure it out, the spaghet­ti-like maze of routs is actu­al­ly quite ratio­nal­ly planned. And from the top of dou­ble-deck­ers, you see a lot, and get a chance to ori­ent your­self that the “tube” does not pro­vide. Read more »

Tuesday, May 1, 2007 — Crown and Parliament

I heard some good music (Ivo Evans Band; The Enor­mous Sizes) at a pub called The End, in a not-very-pros­per­ous part of Cardiff not far from the Uni­ver­si­ty. I felt more com­fort­able there than at the Pen & Wig, the reput­ed hang­out of Sci­ence Fic­tion fans in the city. I popped into that one, briefly, but it looked a bit expen­sive for me, and no one I saw gave off the tell-tale signs of SF fan­dom. I felt more com­fort­able at The End, where I could afford a cou­ple of pints, and I seemed to fit in with the clientele.

Cosburn Street, Cardiff

Cos­burn Street, Cardiff

Read more »

Image of the month: There’s Room for Only ONE Green Lantern

07-05-01 BLOG Image of the month - There's Room for Only ONE Green Lantern

Image of the month:

07-04-01 BLOG Image of the month - Meow!

Image of the month:

07-03-01 BLOG Image of the month

14940. [2] (Thomas Jefferson) Original Draft of the Declaration of Independence [article] 14941. [7] (Thomas Jefferson, et. al.) The Declaration of Independence [article]

I have not yet seen Gary Wills’ renowned study of the Dec­la­ra­tion. But I did read Carl Becker’s work on the same sub­ject when I was a kid. I have made a small rep­u­ta­tion by try­ing to show the glob­al ori­gins of the demo­c­ra­tic idea, as opposed to the con­nect-the-dots Greece-Rome-Britain-Amer­i­ca sequence that is still a major com­po­nent of the cur­rently con­fused unde­rstand­ing of democ­racy. How­ever, that doesn’t mean that I con­sider doc­u­ments like the Dec­la­ra­tion to be unim­por­tant. Far from it. It was so impor­tant, in fact, that minor vari­a­tions in its phras­ing would have made a pro­found dif­fer­ence in the sub­se­quent his­tory, not only of the Unit­ed States, but of the world. Because the Dec­la­ra­tion was in the pock­et, so to speak, of every Amer­i­can, it could have reper­cus­sions, and util­ity, far beyond any philo­soph­i­cal essay. Fred­er­ick Dou­glas, whose char­ac­ter and intel­lect make most of the more famous thinkers of the 19th cen­tury seem puny by com­par­i­son, wrote mov­ingly of the impact its word­ing had on him. When you are a plan­ta­tion slave, as Dou­glas was, the words “We hold these truths to be self-evi­dent, that all men are cre­ated equal…” are not just a snap­py slo­gan. They are hope, enlight­en­ment, des­tiny, right­eous anger, human­ity, solace, and con­cil­i­a­tion com­pounded in a sin­gle sen­tence. That sen­tence is impor­tant to any­one who wish­es to free them­self from slav­ery, and is a pre­cious gem in humanity’s strong­box, not just for Americans.

So it’s inter­est­ing to com­pare Jefferson’s first draft with the final arti­cle. The first ver­sion fol­lows the con­ven­tions of mid-eigh­teenth-cen­tu­ry prose more close­ly. It is said that Thomas Paine had some influ­ence on the revi­sion, and it does shift to blunter, more Quak­erish phras­ing that would seem unusu­al in a cul­tured Vir­gin­ian like Jef­fer­son. But I think it more like­ly that Jef­fer­son real­ized he was think­ing in a new way, and that it had to be said in a new way. The first ver­sion is a prod­uct of a writer to be read in a book. The final ver­sion is a prod­uct of a man tap­ping a moral dimen­sion of the uni­verse. The sad thing is that Jef­fer­son him­self could not live up to his own inspi­ra­tion. The man who did more than any­one except John Wool­man to lay down the moral argu­ment against slav­ery him­self kept slaves. It is true that the Vir­ginia leg­is­la­ture, fear­ful of his exam­ple, had declared that if Jef­fer­son attempt­ed to free his slaves, they would be seized and sold to oth­er, doubt­less cru­el­er mas­ters, but Jef­fer­son, being an undoubt­ed genius, could sure­ly have devised some strat­a­gem to cir­cum­vent this. No, it was just anoth­er sad case of a bril­liant intel­lect capa­ble of imag­in­ing, but not of doing what rea­son demands. 

Image of the month:

07-02-01 BLOG Image of the month

Friday, January 19, 2007 — Schools for Democracy

We have all com­plained about the lack of decent can­di­dates to vote for, in elec­tions. Yet noth­ing com­pels us to con­stant­ly elect sleazy and incom­pe­tent peo­ple to pub­lic office. Every com­mu­ni­ty has tal­ent­ed, hon­ourable, and uncor­rupt­ible peo­ple. It is the struc­ture and cus­tom­ary oper­a­tion of polit­i­cal par­ties that ensure that such peo­ple nev­er enter politics.

So what is the solu­tion for peo­ple who want to see reform and progress in their com­mu­ni­ties (whether local, region­al, or nation­al)? I think the solu­tion is a school. What if there was a School of Demo­c­ra­t­ic Pub­lic Ser­vice? It’s pur­pose would be to pre­pare peo­ple to run for pub­lic office. We expect some­one who runs a hydro-elec­tric plant to study civ­il engi­neer­ing, we expect a car­pen­ter to study car­pen­try. Why should we not expect any­one who presents them­self as a can­di­date for polit­i­cal office to have stud­ied it? This is not the same thing as study­ing “Polit­i­cal Sci­ence”. We would expect a seri­ous can­di­date for pub­lic office to study phi­los­o­phy, eco­nom­ics, man­age­ment, envi­ron­men­tal sci­ence, urbanol­o­gy, his­to­ry, soci­ol­o­gy, law, human rights and moral phi­los­o­phy, among oth­er things, specif­i­cal­ly as they relate to hold­ing pub­lic office. If there was a school which offered a degree of Mas­ter of Demo­c­ra­t­ic Pub­lic Ser­vice, and its cours­es where observ­ably rig­or­ous and pro­gres­sive, I would cer­tain­ly look on any inde­pen­dent can­di­date who held that degree with enough respect to con­sid­er vot­ing for them. If any par­ty went out of its way to select can­di­dates who held such degrees, I would be inclined to take its plat­form seri­ous­ly. I would be even more inclined to vote for some­one who could demon­strate that they did not enter pol­i­tics from busi­ness, or law prac­tices that obvi­ous­ly incline them to bend to spe­cial inter­ests or to seek finan­cial gain through their office. Read more »