Monthly Archives: August 2007

First-time listening for August, 2007

17498. (Gus­tav Mahler) Das Kla­gende Lied [s. Shaguch, DeY­oung, Moser, Leiferkus] 
17499. (Illu­mi­nati) The Illu­mi­nati [with bonus bootlegs]
17500. (Alan Hov­haness) Sym­pho­ny #24, Op.273 “Maj­nun”
17501. (Oscar Peter­son) Oscar Peter­son Plays Duke Ellington
17502. Otan­tic Azer­bay­can Rek­sleri 2: Music of Azerbaijan
17503. (Fred­er­ick Delius) A Walk to the Par­adise Garden
17504. On Mar­co Polo’s Road: The Musi­cians of Kun­duz and Faizabad
17505. (Robert Volk­mann) Konz­ert­stück for Piano and Orches­tra, Op.42
Read more »

READINGAUGUST 2007

15137. (David Dem­chuk) Touch: A Play for Two [play]
15138. (H. Joseph Hebert) Tens of Thou­sands of U.S. Bridges Rat­ed Defi­cient; Repair Costs
. . . . . Esti­mat­ed in the Bil­lions [arti­cle]
15139. (Nor­man F. Can­tor) The Last Knight: The Twi­light of the Mid­dle Ages and the Birth
. . . . . of the Mod­ern Era
15140. (Jonathan Steele) Good News from Bagh­dad at Last: the Oil Law has Stalled [arti­cle]
15141. (John Foot) The Ren­di­tion of Abu Omar [arti­cle]
15142. (Andy Grif­fith) The Day My Butt Went Psycho!
15143. (Robert A. Hein­lein & Spi­der Robin­son) Vari­able Star
Read more »

15176. (Norman F. Cantor) The Last Knight: The Twilight of the Middle Ages and the Birth of the Modern Era

This short and enter­tain­ing account of life in four­teenth cen­tury Eng­land and France uses the life of John of Gaunt to illus­trate its themes. Can­tor is opin­ion­ated. He likes to make analo­gies with today’s social insti­tu­tions, pop­u­lar lit­er­a­ture, and movies. This makes the book feel “unschol­arly”, but it comes clos­er to the actu­al con­ver­sa­tions that his­to­ri­ans are like­ly to hold while dis­cussing John of Gaunt in a pub. It”s the sort of book that should be read by a few friends one evening, then dis­cussed over beer the next.

There are two atti­tudes that one can hold about a dis­tant time. One is that “the past is a for­eign coun­try” — that we can’t real­ly put our­selves in the shoes of four­teenth cen­tury peo­ple, because their expe­ri­ence was fun­da­men­tally alien to our own. The oth­er is that the past is com­pre­hen­si­ble to us psy­cho­log­i­cally, if our inter­pre­ta­tions are based on com­mon sense, because human nature and char­ac­ter remain con­stants. Things in our own expe­ri­ence will present them­selves as clar­i­fy­ing par­al­lels. Can­tor is inclined to this last atti­tude, and so am I. I was not very sur­prised to learn that Can­tor is not the usu­al Oxford don, but the son of a Man­i­toba ranch­er. An ear­lier book of his, which I great­ly enjoyed, exam­ined the per­sonal expe­ri­ences and atti­tudes of sev­eral twen­ti­eth cen­tury his­to­ri­ans who inter­preted the Mid­dle Ages (Invent­ing the Mid­dle Ages, 1992).

Harry Somers’ Songs

Har­ry Somers (1925–1999) was prob­a­bly the most respect­ed com­poser in Toron­to dur­ing his gen­er­a­tion. The seri­al­ist John Weinzweig found him com­pos­ing, self-taught, as a teenag­er, and encour­aged him to train vig­or­ously in both tra­di­tional har­mony and in avant-garde twelve-tone tech­niques. He end­ed up train­ing under the fair­ly con­ser­v­a­tive French com­poser, Dar­ius Mil­haud. In the end, he set­tled on an eclec­tic style. Up until now, all I’ve lis­tened to close­ly was his just­ly pop­u­lar Five Songs from New­found­land Out­ports. But today, I lis­tened to a col­lec­tion of his songs, both sec­u­lar and sacred, by the Elmer Isler Singers. I was sur­prised at their com­bi­na­tion of sassy humour — “Spot­ted Snakes” is the best exam­ple of that — and lyri­cal beau­ty. The “Three Songs of New France” are real­ly fine, quite as good as the famed New­found­land set. The sacred pieces com­bine con­ven­tional rev­er­ence with some uncon­ven­tional twists. I par­tic­u­larly like “God The Mas­ter of This Scene” and “Bless’d Is the Gar­den of the Lord”. There’s a touch of Mes­si­aen in these, but in a clean-cut, whole­some Toron­to boy way. Cana­dian com­posers, even when they see them­selves as bad boys, tend to be polite and well-scrubbed behind the ears. It’s our kismet.

(Englund 1963) The Ugly American

This fas­ci­nat­ing film, based on the best-sell­ing 1958 nov­el by Eugene Bur­dick, and filmed in the trau­mat­ic year of 1963, con­tains one of Mar­lin Bran­do’s best per­for­mances. Bran­do was at the height of his pow­ers, and instinc­tive­ly knew how to act with his body, mak­ing every ges­ture, every slump of a shoul­der or crease of a brow advance the story.

The film is also fas­ci­nat­ing from a polit­i­cal point of view. Amer­i­cans were just start­ing to expe­ri­ence a series of embar­rass­ing set­backs in for­eign pol­i­cy. They were com­mit­ted to an immoral and aston­ish­ing­ly stu­pid pol­i­cy of sup­port­ing dic­ta­tors and betray­ing under­dogs. Every intel­li­gent and humane per­son in the U.S. knew this. How­ev­er, the analy­sis of the pol­i­cy’s oppo­nents suf­fered from some seri­ous flaws. The ortho­doxy among crit­ics of Amer­i­can for­eign pol­i­cy was that peo­ple like Fidel Cas­tro were mere­ly patri­ot­ic nation­al lead­ers who were being “dri­ven into the arms” of the Sovi­et Union by the fool­ish hos­til­i­ty of the White House. This idea was pure non­sense. Cas­tro, and oth­er like him, were clients of the Sovi­et Union from the start, and tyrants from day one. Their adher­ence to the Sovi­et Empire was auto­mat­ic, and dri­ven by the fun­da­men­tal evil of their natures. Clever for­eign pol­i­cy might have bought them off, or bet­ter yet, allowed their local vic­tims to over­throw them. How­ev­er, the U.S. State Depart­ment did not employ any­one with either brains or prin­ci­ples. Every infan­tile and cor­rupt “strate­gic” step they took, usu­al­ly jus­ti­fied with smarmy plat­i­tudes about “real­ism”, mere­ly played into the hands of the Sovi­ets and entrenched the sovi­et clients in power.

In oth­er words, both the pro­po­nents and the crit­ics of U.S. for­eign pol­i­cy, at the time, didn”t know what the hell they were talk­ing about. Not sur­pris­ing­ly, short­ly after the release of this movie, Amer­i­ca began its dis­as­trous war in Vietnam.

THIRD MEDITATION ON DEMOCRACY (written Saturday, August 18, 2007)

West­ern Europe, and lands cul­tur­al­ly derived from it, have made some rel­a­tive­ly suc­cess­ful approx­i­ma­tions of democ­ra­cy and civ­il soci­ety, and com­bined them with notice­able pros­per­i­ty. Peo­ple both inside and out­side this favoured zone won­der why, and they have often sought the answer in two par­tic­u­lar areas: reli­gious tra­di­tions, and the dra­mat­ic intel­lec­tu­al era called “the Enlight­en­ment”. As some­one who has writ­ten about the uni­ver­sal aspects of democ­ra­cy, I’ve often felt some annoy­ance at what I con­sid­er parochial views of his­to­ry, and dubi­ous ideas of causal­i­ty. I feel great sym­pa­thy for peo­ple out­side the favoured zone, who are hope­ful that they can have a demo­c­ra­t­ic future, but are dis­com­fit­ed by the “sec­ond-banana” sta­tus that it seems to imply for their cul­tur­al her­itage. This is espe­cial­ly true in the Islam­ic world, where past cul­tur­al glo­ries and present embar­rass­ments com­bine to make the search for demo­c­ra­t­ic reform a touchy sub­ject. I think that an exces­sive­ly car­toon­ish view of the Enlight­en­ment, and of the rela­tion­ship between reli­gion and democ­ra­cy, is part of the problem.

I recent­ly read two arti­cles by Tas­saduq Hus­sain Jil­lani, a supreme court jus­tice in Pak­istan. Though Pak­istan has mil­len­nia of cul­tur­al achieve­ment — it was one of the ear­li­est cen­ters of urban civ­i­liza­tion — and it has a well edu­cat­ed pop­u­la­tion, it lan­guish­es under a crude mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor­ship. It has expe­ri­enced much strife from con­flict­ing reli­gious fac­tions. While its econ­o­my is a sham­bles, the mil­i­tary thugs who run the place take pride in their pos­ses­sion of nuclear weapons. Read more »

SECOND MEDITATION ON DEMOCRACY (written Monday, August 7, 2007)

Civ­i­liza­tion is the process in which one grad­u­al­ly increas­es the num­ber of peo­ple includ­ed in the term ‘we’ or ‘us’ and at the same time decreas­es those labeled ‘you’ or ‘them’ until that cat­e­go­ry has no one left in it.” — Howard Win­ters, an Amer­i­can archael­o­gist who stud­ied ancient set­tle­ment and trade pat­terns [quot­ed by Anne-Marie Cantwell in Howard Dal­ton Win­ters: In Memo­ri­am]

“Voice or no voice, the peo­ple can always be brought to the bid­ding of the lead­ers. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the paci­fists for lack of patri­o­tism and expos­ing the coun­try to dan­ger. It works the same in any coun­try.” — Her­mann Wil­helm Göring, sec­ond in com­mand to Adolf Hitler.

What most telling­ly dis­tin­guish­es demo­c­ra­t­ic from non-demo­c­ra­t­ic thought is its respect for human beings. By this, I don’t mean respect for some neb­u­lous abstrac­tion called “human­i­ty” or “the peo­ple”, which is all too eas­i­ly trans­formed into a mys­ti­cal col­lec­tivism. It’s a respect for real-life indi­vid­ual human beings, who live, fall in love, have chil­dren, and strug­gle to find secu­ri­ty and hap­pi­ness. In demo­c­ra­t­ic thought, the well­be­ing of indi­vid­ual human beings is the pur­pose and mea­sure of polit­i­cal choic­es. Well­be­ing, to the demo­c­rat, is defined first in terms of what mat­ters most to con­scious beings — lib­er­ty, self-respect, dig­ni­ty, con­trol over their own lives. The phys­i­cal neces­si­ties of life, such as food and shel­ter, are mean­ing­less to human beings except with­in the con­text of those val­ues. We are not cat­tle. Read more »

15143. (Robert A. Heinlein & Spider Robinson) Variable Star

At the 2003 World Sci­ence Fic­tion Con­ven­tion in Toron­to, it was revealed that an out­line exist­ed for a nov­el that Robert Hein­lein had cho­sen not to write. The out­line, pre­pared in 1955, was detailed. It cried out to be com­pleted, and vet­eran sci­ence fic­tion writer Spi­der Robin­son was assigned the task. Vari­able Star, is the result.

I think that sci­ence fic­tion is in the mid­dle of a process of self-destruc­tion. While the glob­al read­ing pop­u­la­tion has been expand­ing, the sci­ence fic­tion shelves in the book­stores have been shrink­ing. It is now almost impos­si­ble for a new writer to break into the field, and edi­to­r­ial poli­cies are increas­ingly con­ser­v­a­tive and for­mu­laic. At the same time, there’s a per­va­sive recy­cling of old mate­r­ial. One of the most annoy­ing activ­i­ties is the pub­li­ca­tion of end­less sequels to old works, some­times writ­ten by oth­ers after the death of the author, or works “set in the uni­verse of” an estab­lished clas­sic. Baroque styl­is­tic con­vo­lu­tions are pre­ferred. We have entered a kind of Hel­lenis­tic Alexan­dria, where the dead out­rank the liv­ing and clev­er­ness con­sists of say­ing what has been said before, only in a more con­fus­ing and duller way. Read more »

Utopia Triumphans and Tallis’ Spem In Alium

07-08-02 LISTN Utopia Tri­umphans and Tallis' Spem in AliumThe Huel­gas Ensem­ble, under the direc­tion of Paul Van Nev­el, put togeth­er a col­lec­tion of Renais­sance poly­phonic works for large choirs, which they called “Utopia Tri­umphans”. In fact, these works are for huge choirs. It starts with Thomas Tallis’ aston­ish­ing 40-part motet Spem in ali­um, and ends with Alessan­dro Striggio’s 40-part Ecce beat­am lucem. Striggio’s piece was per­formed in Eng­land in 1567, and caused such a stir that it was tak­en as a chal­lenge. It is said that Tallis was com­mis­sioned to com­pose an “answer”, and Spem in ali­um was the result (how­ever some author­i­ties doubt this story).

Motets on this scale are very dif­fi­cult to mount. The man­u­script kicked around for cen­turies, but no doubt those who looked at it shrugged their shoul­ders. Inter­est­ing, but too much work to put on, and Tallis had lit­tle sell­ing pow­er. His rep­u­ta­tion was eclipsed by his pupil William Byrd, and if Ralph Vaugh­an Williams had not com­posed his Fan­ta­sia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis, few would have heard his name. But in 1965, the choir of King’s Col­lege Cam­bridge took a chance, and record­ed it. Sub­se­quently, there was a revival of inter­est in Tallis, and today I noticed a site list­ing it among the “top 10 essen­tial choral pieces”. There have been many record­ings of it, the most well known being that of the Tallis Schol­ars. Per­haps the most amaz­ing trib­ute to the work is in the Nation­al Gallery of Cana­da, in Ottawa. Here, Maya 3D mod­el­ing soft­ware, laser scan­ning and pho­togram­me­try were used to accu­rately recre­ate the inte­rior of a beau­ti­ful con­vent chapel which, unfor­tu­nately, had to be demol­ished. With­in this mod­el (where even the “sun­light” in the stained glass is arti­fi­cial), forty speak­ers set around the chapel each play the sound of a sin­gle voice of the forty-part choir, allow­ing for an espe­cially intense, and vari­able expe­ri­ence of the piece. Read more »

Image of the month: Stop

ZZTOP364 (3252)