Monday, September 15, 2008 — Of Oil and Elections

If one exam­ines close­ly the speech that Stephen Harp­er gave to an Amer­i­can con­ser­v­a­tive think-tank, before he became our Prime Min­is­ter [1], one is struck imme­di­ate­ly by this: our Prime Min­is­ter hates Cana­da and despis­es Cana­di­ans. We are, in his own words “a sec­ond-rate country”[2]. In state­ment after state­ment, Mr. Harp­er made it clear that his only loy­al­ty is to the rich and pow­er­ful in oth­er coun­tries, and not to Cana­da or Cana­di­ans. For most of his life, the Rich and Pow­er­ful lived in the Unit­ed States, and that is where his spir­it has hov­ered. The Unit­ed States that he wor­ships, with the most abject and slav­ish ser­vil­i­ty, is not, of course, the real Unit­ed States, the one embod­ied in the Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence, or in its two cen­turies of strug­gle for free­dom and jus­tice. No, what Mr. Harp­er wor­ships is the cur­rent, King George’s ver­sion of the Unit­ed States, the one that has been betrayed, degrad­ed, debauched and bank­rupt­ed by a gen­er­a­tion of Con­ser­v­a­tive trea­son. Read more »

(Cragg 2007) Boston Legal: Ep.77 ― No Brains Left Behind

08-09-14 VIEW (Cragg 2007) Boston Legal Ep.77 ― No Brains Left BehindBoston Legalhas been doing a good job of oppos­ing the sta­tus quo in the Unit­ed States, and is bril­liant­ly fun­ny in the process. My thanks go to Isaac White for draw­ing my atten­tion to this series, and bring­ing over files of it to watch. This par­tic­u­lar episode is the fun­ni­est I’ve seen, and the best exam­ple of stand­ing up to the morons. It not only takes on the Iraq War, but Bush’s idi­ot­ic and destruc­tive edu­ca­tion poli­cies. While all the act­ing is good in this series, the best parts are when James Spad­er and William Shat­ner inter­act. Shat­ner has, over the years, matured into a bril­liant com­ic actor.

Gavin Taaffe: Sad Songs

It can be awk­ward to review an album when the musi­cian is a per­sonal friend, espe­cially when one of the songs ref­er­ences events one has per­son­ally wit­nessed, but not in this case. The music speaks for itself. This com­pi­la­tion of songs com­posed over the last eight years con­firms Gavin Taaffe’s sta­tus as an upcom­ing singer-song­writer worth com­par­ing to Bruce Cock­burn or Suf­jan Stevens. The lyrics are intel­li­gent, sub­tle, sup­ple… and, yes, sad. You should have a taste for con­cen­trated pes­simism tem­pered by a sense of sur­vival to enjoy them. Inef­fa­ble feel­ings of dis­ap­point­ment, loss, and long­ing are cap­tured in crisp ver­bal images and piquant melod­ic phras­es and gui­tar licks. Rec­om­mended for late-night listening.

16505. (Graeme Barker) The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory ― Why did Foragers Become Farmers?

This work brings me up to date on the cur­rent state of evi­dence and the­ory con­cern­ing the tran­si­tion to agri­cul­ture. Graeme Bark­er sum­ma­rizes many reports that I haven’t seen, includ­ing for­eign lan­guage ones that I couldn’t have. On the whole, it is grat­i­fy­ing to me, as it shows that both the weight of evi­dence and the weight of opin­ion have been grad­u­ally shift­ing towards my own views. The genet­ic, pale­ob­otan­i­cal, and pale­oiso­topic evi­dence is all push­ing it in that direc­tion. I’m hap­py to see that fish­ing is now accord­ed the promi­nent posi­tion that it deserves. In the long run, I think that fur­ther evi­dence will force the pro­fes­sion­als to make the “leap” that I feel is nec­es­sary. Cur­rently, pre­his­toric trade net­works, while rec­og­nized, are still seen as inci­den­tal, or irrel­e­vant to the tran­si­tion. A few the­o­rists posit that they play a role in fos­ter­ing elites and seden­tarism ― with the assump­tion that acqui­si­tion of “pres­tige goods” was the essence of such trade. I believe, on the oth­er hand, that the process of sub­stitut­ing goods for­merly import­ed through this trade sys­tem by local pro­duc­tion, is the heart of the mat­ter. Pre­his­toric trade, I think we will dis­cover, was over­whelm­ingly con­cerned with food sta­ples, wide­ly used prod­ucts, and “mass mar­ket” tech­nol­ogy, with “pres­tige goods” mere­ly a side-effect. The spread of agri­cul­ture was mere­ly one aspect of an ongo­ing macro-eco­nom­ic process that has its roots in the ear­ly devel­op­ment of homo-sapi­ens, and not a dis­rup­tion of a sta­tic or “non-eco­nom­ic” pre-agri­cul­tur­al soci­ety, com­ing out of the blue. None of the pre­vail­ing “push” or “pull” visu­al­iza­tions of the adop­tion of agri­cul­ture rec­og­nize the impor­tance of this process. The archae­o­log­i­cal evi­dence, espe­cially in north­ern Europe, screams out to be inter­preted in this way. It will mere­ly take a small con­cep­tual shift to make it hap­pen. I would real­ly love to sit down with some of the peo­ple who are closeto mak­ing the leap, and argue them into it.

Ali Farka Touré and Ry Cooder Talking Timbuktu

08-09-07 LISTN Ali Farka Touré and Ry Cooder Talking TimbuktuI’ve writ­ten else­where of my love for the music of Ali Far­ka Touré, whose every chord calls back mem­o­ries of the Sahara, and whose spir­it hov­ered above Tim­buk­tu like an angel. His was a pro­found and sub­tle art, which turned the “blues” into a clar­i­on of sub­lime affir­ma­tion. His native Mali suf­fered the exploita­tion of dic­ta­tor­ship and the hor­rors of civ­il war, but he remained undaunt­ed in his opti­mism. While oth­er Malian musi­cians fled to Europe and Amer­i­ca to pur­sue their careers, Touré stuck it out at home. The over­throw of dic­ta­tor­ship pro­duced a renais­sance of Malian music. Touré was the very sol­id rock on which that renais­sance was found­ed. True to his char­ac­ter, he spent the last years of his life serv­ing as may­or of a small vil­lage near Tim­buk­tu, spend­ing the mon­ey from his inter­na­tion­al record­ings to pro­vide it with sew­er­age and elec­tric­i­ty. My favourite album of his will always be The Source(1993), but jostling against it for that posi­tion is this won­der­ful 1995 col­lab­o­ra­tion with Amer­i­can gui­tarist Ry Cood­er, Talk­ing Tim­buk­tu. Unlike some of the rather patron­iz­ing duets between African artists and Euro­pean or Amer­i­can super­stars, this one is an easy-going ses­sion between two pro­fes­sion­al musi­cians who have lit­tle patience with stage-egos or man­u­fac­tured images. Cood­er is as Amer­i­can as they come, and Touré as African as they come, and both under­stood how those two places are musi­cal­ly and spir­i­tu­al­ly inter­twined. Amer­i­ca could not have become Amer­i­ca with­out Africa. It would just have been one more place where they danced with wood­en clogs in 4/4 time, and played the accor­dion. It could not have brought forth Elling­ton, Gersh­win, Satch­mo, Good­man and Chuck Berry and all that came from them. Lis­ten to the mar­velous per­for­mances of “Ai Du” and “Diara­by” on this album, and you’ll hear that brotherhood.

Haydn’s Symphonies “A” and “B”

Since I found a set of scores for Haydn’s first fifty sym­phonies (pub­lished in Ger­many, and appar­ent­ly with­drawn from the Mannes Col­lege of Music in New York City some­time in the 1960s), it behooves me to lis­ten to them with score in hand. I’m not sure why the first two are not num­bered, but labeled “A” and “B”, but I pre­sume it’s because their attri­bu­tion is doubt­ful. “B” cer­tain­ly sounds like Haydn. “A” is plod­ding and mechan­i­cal, and could have been com­posed by any­body. The role of the com­pos­er in the first half of the 18th cen­tu­ry was rather like that of a rave dj. He was expect­ed to “spin” what­ev­er was at hand, and much mate­r­i­al was recy­cled from his own (or oth­ers’) out­put. Nobody kept track of who com­posed what, except as an after-thought. Com­posers where con­stant­ly fired and rehired by patrons, and hop­ping from one prince­ly court to anoth­er cre­at­ed oppor­tu­ni­ties for pur­loin­ing works, or rehash­ing one’s own. When nec­es­sary, baroque music could be man­u­fac­tured in min­utes, by assem­bling cook­ie-cut­ter pat­terns. Some baroque com­posers, like Giuseppe Torel­li, seem to have “com­posed” more music than could be played end-to-end over their life­times. Some­one used to the mod­ern idea of a “sym­pho­ny” would bare­ly rec­og­nize these pieces as such. Lat­er on, Haydn him­self, and the young Mozart, would cre­ate the com­plex form of that name, by expand­ing the orches­tra­tion and cre­at­ing struc­tur­al uni­ty beyond the mere lump­ing togeth­er of vague­ly sim­i­lar pieces. The sym­phonies of this peri­od were what we would call “suites” today. But that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t be intel­li­gent and entertaining.

Image of the month

08-09-01 BLOG Image of the month

First-time listening for August, 2008

18962. (Franz Josef Haydn) Sym­pho­ny “A” in B‑flat [1762]
18963. (Franz Josef Haydn) Sym­pho­ny “B” in B‑flat [1765]
(Ruth Gold­en, sopra­no) Silent Noon: Songs of Ralph Vaugh­an Williams
. . . . 18964. (Ralph Vaugh­an Williams) House of Life, Six Songs to Poems of Dante Gabriel
. . . . . . . . Ros­set­ti for Bari­tone and Piano [arr. for sopra­no and piano] [see orig­i­nal at 16063]
. . . . 18965. (Ralph Vaugh­an Williams) Four Last Songs to Poems of Ursu­la Vaugh­an Williams
. . . . 18966. (Ralph Vaugh­an Williams) “Lin­den Lea”, song for voice & orches­tra (“In Lin­den Lea”;
. . . . . . . . “A Dorset Song”) [arr. voice & piano]
Read more »

READING – AUGUST 2008

16395. (Thomas T. Allsen) The Roy­al Hunt in Eurasian His­to­ry
16396. (Philip K. Dick) The Zap Gun ― Being that Most Excel­lent Account of Tra­vails and
. . . . . Con­tayn­ing Many Pretie His­to­ries By Him Set Foorth in Come­ly Colours and
. . . . . Most Delight­ful­ly Dis­coursed Upon as Beau­ti­fied and Well Fur­nished Divers
. . . . . Good and Com­mend­able in the Gesi­ht of Men of That Most Lam­en­ta­ble Wepens
. . . . . Fasoun Design­er Lars Pow­derdry and What Near­ly Became of Him Due to
. . . . . Cer­tain Most Dread­ful Forces

16397. (Charles Allen) God’s Ter­ror­ists ― The Wah­habi Cult and the Hid­den Roots of
. . . . . Mod­ern Jihad
16398. (Peter Ack­royd) Thames ― Sacred Riv­er
16399. (Michael H. Shu­man) The Small-Mart Rev­o­lu­tion ― How Local Busi­ness­es are
. . . . . Beat­ing the Glob­al Com­pe­ti­tion
16400. (Robert McCloskey) Homer Price
16401. (David K. Wyatt) Thai­land, a Short His­to­ry
16402. (Edward Schneier) Craft­ing Con­sti­tu­tion­al Democ­ra­cies ― The Pol­i­tics of Insti­tu­tion­al
. . . . . Design
16403. (Jana Švábová & Tomáš Rygl) Prague
16404. (Jonathan Jar­rett) [in blog A Cor­ner of Tenth-Cen­tu­ry Europe] Inter­dis­ci­pli­nary
. . . . . Con­ver­sa­tion: Veg­etable Barter [arti­cle]
16405. (Steve Muhlberg­er) [in blog Muhlberger’s Ear­ly His­to­ry] The Pennsic War [arti­cle]
(Rich Coad –ed.) Sense of Won­der Sto­ries ― Issue Zero, Feb­ru­ary 2007 [zine]
. . . . 16406. (Rich Coad) What This Coun­try Needs [pref­ace]
. . . . 16407. (Bruce Town­ley) Mod­el Cit­i­zen [arti­cle]
. . . . 16408. (Rich Coad) The Built a Crooked Uni­verse [arti­cle]
. . . . 16408. (Rich Coad) Spung! [arti­cle]
. . . . 16409. (Ian Maule) I Dood It ! [arti­cle]
(Rich Coad –ed.) Sense of Won­der Sto­ries # 1, 2007 [zine]
. . . . 16410. (Rich Coad) Won­der­to­r­i­al [pref­ace]
. . . . 16411. (Randy Byers) The Ear­ly Days of a Bet­ter Genre [arti­cle]
. . . . 16412. (Bruce Town­ley) The Shad­ows Out of Space [arti­cle]
. . . . 16413. (Robert Licht­man) Love­craft In The Real World [arti­cle]
. . . . 16414. (Bill Burns) Thomas Edi­son and the Elec­tric Pen [arti­cle]
. . . . 16415. Let­ters from Chris Gar­cia, Mark Plum­mer, Har­ry Bell, John Pur­cell, Jer­ry
. . . . . . . . Kauf­man, Claire Bri­a­ley, and Cy Chau­vin [let­ters]
(Rich Coad –ed.) Sense of Won­der Sto­ries #2, July 2008 [zine]
. . . . 16416. (Rich Coad) Won­der­to­r­i­al [pref­ace]
. . . . 16417. (Bruce Gille­spie) The Good Sol­dier: George Turn­er as Com­bat­ive Crit­ic [arti­cle]
. . . . 16418. (Bruce Town­ley) A Dream Flight [arti­cle]
. . . . 16419. (Peter West­on) Heresy, Maybe? [arti­cle]
. . . . 16420. (Gra­ham Charnock) J. G. Bal­lard, A Jour­ney of Infer­ence [arti­cle]
. . . . 16421. Let­ters from Robert Licht­man, John Pur­cell, Eric May­er, John Nielsen-Hall, Jim
. . . . . . . . Lin­wood, Mog Decarnin, James Bacon [let­ters]
16422. (Eric L. Jones) Cul­tures Merg­ing ― A His­tor­i­cal and Eco­nom­ic Cri­tique of Cul­ture
(Robert A. Hein­lein) The Unpleas­ant Pro­fes­sion of Johnathan Hoag:
. . . . 16423. [3] (Robert A. Hein­lein) The Unpleas­ant Pro­fes­sion of Jonathan Hoag [sto­ry]
. . . . 16424. [3] (Robert A. Hein­lein) The Man Who Trav­eled in Ele­phants [= The Ele­phant
. . . . . . . . Cir­cuit] [sto­ry]
. . . . 16425. [4] (Robert A. Hein­lein) “All You Zom­bies—” [sto­ry]
. . . . 16426. [2] (Robert A. Hein­lein) They [sto­ry]
. . . . 16427. [2] (Robert A. Hein­lein) Our Fair City [sto­ry]
. . . . 16428. [2] (Robert A. Hein­lein) “—And He Built a Crooked House” [sto­ry]
16429. (Mar­jorie Man­del­stan Balz­er) The Tenac­i­ty of Eth­nic­i­ty: A Siber­ian Saga in Glob­al
. . . . . Per­spec­tive
(Yaron Matras, Peter Bakker & Hris­to Kyuchukov –ed.) The Typol­o­gy and Dialec­tol­ogy of Romani:
. . . . 16430. (Peter Bakker & Yaron Matras) Intro­duc­tion [pref­ace]
. . . . 16431. (Peter Bakker) Ath­e­mat­ic Mor­phol­o­gy in Romani: The Bor­row­ing of a
. . . . . . . . Bor­row­ing Pat­tern [arti­cle]
. . . . 16432. (Vik­tor Elšik) Towards a Mor­phol­o­gy-based Typol­o­gy of Romani [arti­cle]
. . . . 16433. (Yaron Matras) The Typol­o­gy of Case Rela­tions and Case Lay­er Dis­tri­b­u­tion in
. . . . . . . . Romani [arti­cle]
. . . . 16434. (Vít Bubeník) Object Dou­bling in Romani and the Balkan Lan­guages [arti­cle]
. . . . 16435. (Nor­bert Boret­zky) Sup­ple­tive Forms of the Romani Cop­u­la: “ovel /avel”
. . . . . . . . [arti­cle]
. . . . 16436. (Mile­na Hüb­schan­nová & Vít Bubeník) Causatives in Slo­vak and Hun­gar­i­an
. . . . . . . . Romani [arti­cle]
. . . . 16437. (Bir­git Igla) The Romani Dialect of the Rhodopes [arti­cle]
. . . . 16438. (Petra Cech & Mozes F. Hein­schink) The Dialect of the Bas­ket-Weavers
. . . . . . . . [Sepečides] of Izmir [arti­cle]
. . . . 16439. (Vic­tor A. Fried­man) Lin­guis­tic Form and Con­tent in the Romani-lan­guage Press
. . . . . . . . of the Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia [arti­cle]
. . . . 16440. (Ian F. Han­cock) George Borrow’s Romani [arti­cle]
16441. (Steve Muhlberg­er) [in blog Muhlberger’s Ear­ly His­to­ry] Excit­ing Views on Schol­ar­ship
. . . . . [arti­cle]

16442. (Michael Drout) [in blog Wormtalk and Slugs­peak] A Mod­el ―But Would it Work if it
. . . . . Were Gen­er­al­ized? [arti­cle]
16443. (Michael Drout) [in blog Wormtalk and Slugs­peak] Method: Push the Metaphor Until it
. . . . . Breaks ― or, Mock­ing “Imbri­cat­ed” Yet Again [arti­cle]
16444. (Tu Thanh Ha, Bill Cur­ry & Anne McIl­roy) Inspec­tors Failed to Adopt More Rig­or­ous
. . . . . U.S. Mea­sures [arti­cle]

16422. (Eric L. Jones) Cultures Merging ― A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture

“Cul­ture” is a slip­pery con­cept, used in many dif­fer­ent ways by his­to­ri­ans, anthro­pol­o­gists and econ­o­mists. Jones’ book is more a sur­vey than the cri­tique implied by the title, but it is an extreme­ly use­ful and well-pre­sent­ed sur­vey. I pre­fer this, since it is best to start off with some idea of who has thought and said what about the sub­ject before plung­ing into debates. Pre­sump­tions about cul­ture, espe­cially about whether it deter­mines how peo­ple act eco­nom­i­cally, or mere­ly shapes itself on the basis of how peo­ple mustact eco­nom­i­cally, under­lie all sorts of the­o­ries and descrip­tions in the three fields. Usu­ally these pre­sump­tions are shared by some group of thinkers with­out them being explic­itly stat­ed. Argu­ments between dif­fer­ent groups, with dif­fer­ent pre­sump­tions, usu­ally result in con­fu­sion. But a num­ber of works, in all three dis­ci­plines, either illus­trate or make explic­it par­tic­u­lar ideas of culture’s rela­tion to behav­iour and economies. Schol­ars have tak­en their cues from these sem­i­nal works, and pol­i­cy-mak­ers adhered to any of sev­eral con­tra­dic­tory atti­tudes gen­er­ated by them. Some have been down­right sil­ly (such as “the end of his­tory” and “clash of civ­i­liza­tions” tom-fool­ery). Jones presents most of them fair­ly dis­pas­sion­ately, but he is obvi­ously impa­tient with the stu­pider ones, and does not hide it. Of spe­cial inter­est to me is his sen­si­ble dis­cus­sion of the “Asian Val­ues” mys­tique, pro­moted by many East Asian econ­o­mists and politi­cians, and often uncrit­i­cally accept­ed else­where. (He cites Steve Muhlberg­er and myself in this dis­cus­sion, so I could hard­ly fail to find it inter­est­ing.) On the whole, Jones gets the horse in front of the cart rather than the oth­er way round. He plumps for com­mon-sense cau­sa­tion when it is pos­si­ble, and holds back his con­clu­sions when cau­sa­tion can­not be dis­cerned, rather than appeal to enig­matic col­lec­tive properties.