Image of the month:

06-09-01 Image of the month

First-time listening for August, 2006

16290. (Siouxsie and the Ban­shees) Juju
Rough Guide to Brazil: Bahia:
. . . . 16291. (Tim­bal­a­da) “Motum­ba”
. . . . 16292. (Sylvia Tor­res) “Take Sar­a­va”
. . . . 16293. (Daniela Mer­cury) “Swing Da Cor”
. . . . 16294. (Ze Paulo Beck­er) “A Vida e Boa”
. . . . 16295. (Riachao) “Pita­da de Taba­co”
Read more »

READING – AUGUST 2006

14719. (Bri­an Doyle) Easy Avenue
14720. (Mary Mapes) Truth andDuty ― The Press, the Pres­i­dent, and the Priv­iledge of Pow­er
(Wal­ter Mosley) Future­land: Nine Sto­ries of an Immi­nent World:
. . . . 14721. (Wal­ter Mosley) Whis­pers in the Dark [sto­ry]
. . . . 14722. (Wal­ter Mosley) The Great­est [sto­ry]
. . . . 14723. (Wal­ter Mosley) Doc­tor Kismet [sto­ry]
Read more »

(Hitchcock 1936) The Secret Agent; (Hitchcock 1936) Sabotage

Two fas­ci­nat­ing ear­ly Hitch­cock films both from 1936. The Secret Agentis rather clum­si­ly plot­ted but has some charm. It is star­tling to see John Giel­gud as a hand­some young roman­tic lead, and Peter Lorre pro­vides an eccen­tric per­for­mance as a sort of gener­ic com­i­cal “for­eign­er”. Sab­o­tagepro­vides a fris­sonto today’s view­er. The plot involves a ter­ror­ist plant­i­ng a bomb on a Lon­don bus. Hitch­cock pulls no punch­es: he builds up a lik­able child char­ac­ter, then bru­tal­ly blows him up, halfway through the film. It would have been impos­si­ble to do this in an Amer­i­can film until decades lat­er. But audi­ences did not like it, and Hitch­cock lat­er con­sid­ered it a lapse of judge­ment. The ter­ror­ist in the film employs a liq­uid explo­sive of the same type as seems to have been used in the foiled mul­ti­ple air­plane bomb­ing of the last few days. 

14746. (Elliott Leyton) Hunting Humans

This is the sem­i­nal work on the anthro­pol­ogy and soci­ol­ogy of ser­ial killing. I read it in con­junc­tion with an NFBdoc­u­men­tary film “The Man Who Stud­ies Mur­der”, which puts a face to the voice of the book. Ley­ton is a coun­try boy from small-town Saskatchewan (who looks and sounds dis­tinctly Metis, though I can’t say for sure that he is) and now lives in New­found­land. New­found­land is rur­al, poor by North Amer­i­can stan­dards, and vir­tu­ally every house has a gun. Eco­nom­i­cally, it’s the Cana­dian equiv­a­lent of Arkansas. But it has one of the low­est mur­der rates in the world. In the film, Ley­ton dis­cusses the rea­sons why he con­sid­ers cul­tural choic­es and mores the prin­ci­pal deter­mi­nant of mur­der rates and styles of mur­der, often using his home as a laboratory.

The book on ser­ial and mass killers, deal­ing with the “clas­sic” cas­es, attempts to get beyond the kind of unver­i­fi­able psy­chi­atric spec­u­la­tions that dom­i­nated the issue before Ley­ton came on the scene. As he demon­strates, psy­chi­a­try has been of lit­tle use in under­stand­ing the phe­nom­e­non. He shows the fun­da­men­tal sim­i­lar­i­ties in most ser­ial killings, and does his best to deflate the non­sense gen­er­ated by Thomas Harris’s “Han­ni­bal Lecter” fan­tasies. Ser­ial killers are invari­ably pathet­ic, inef­fec­tive losers, usu­ally pret­ty dumb.…. nev­er the suave super­ge­niuses of fic­tion. Ley­ton rejects bio­log­i­cal and psy­chi­atric expla­na­tions in favour of a cul­tural one, and argues it per­sua­sively. He may not have the last word on this issue, but his opin­ions are more worth read­ing than most. He is also a wit­ty and enter­tain­ing writer ― and from the evi­dence of the film, has the same qual­i­ties in person.

(Scorcese & Wilson 1995) A Personal Journey With Martin Scorsece Through American Movies

06-08-26 VIEW (Scorcese & Wilson 1995) A Personal Journey With Martin Scorsece Through American MoviesScors­ese is a high­ly cul­tured, lit­er­ate and civ­i­lized man, with­out pre­ten­sion and remark­ably free of snob­bery. In this study of the Amer­i­can films that enter­tained and influ­enced him, he opens our eyes to the artistry of many Hol­ly­wood films ― west­erns, gang­ster films, musi­cals, and low-bud­get thrillers ― that film his­to­ri­ans and crit­ics would sneer at. This four hours long doc­u­men­tary under­mines that obnox­ious ten­den­cy in all the arts, the glo­ri­fi­ca­tion of an offi­cial canon of “clas­sics”. His analy­sis of films by for­got­ten and under­rat­ed direc­tors is sharp, but affec­tion­ate.

Plan B

06-08-25 BLOG Plan BIf you want to know the dif­fer­ence between a free coun­try and a col­lec­tivist, sovi­etized soci­ety, where the State directs, manip­u­lates and social­ly engi­neers the life of the indi­vid­ual, then one has only to walk into a drug­store in Cana­da and then into one in the Unit­ed States. In any Cana­di­an drug­store, any woman can pur­chase Plan B, the “morn­ing after pill”, with­out pre­scrip­tion or harass­ment, as is her right. In the Unit­ed States, this is not the case. There, the State rules over the most pri­vate domain of the indi­vid­ual. As in Com­mu­nist Chi­na, Amer­i­cans suf­fer a gov­ern­ment which con­sid­ers their bod­ies the prop­er­ty of the State. Their most inti­mate per­son­al choic­es do not belong to them, but to an all-pow­er­ful col­lec­tivism, to the Leviathan. It makes me pro­found­ly grate­ful that I live in a sig­nif­i­cant­ly freer, more indi­vid­u­al­ist soci­ety, where, as one Cana­di­an Prime Min­is­ter once pro­claimed, “The State has no place in the bed­rooms of the nation.” 

There are many things of which I dis­ap­prove in my own coun­try, and Lord knows there are plen­ty of stu­pid things that hap­pen here. But, at least we are not reduced to such pathet­ic serf­dom that we sur­ren­der our sex­u­al organs to the tyran­ny of squalid bureau­crats and a Supreme Sovi­et on Penn­syl­va­nia Avenue.

Thursday, August 24, 2006 — Moscow Nights on the Subway

One of those lit­tle moments of beau­ty. I was in the Finch sub­way sta­tion. There are musi­cians who busk in many of the sta­tions. In this case, it was an old man with an accor­dion. He struck up a few chords, instant­ly famil­iar to me. And to some­one else. A mid­dle-aged Asian woman, walk­ing by, also rec­og­nized what was com­ing, and imme­di­ate­ly began to sing. It was a trained voice, very beau­ti­ful. She sang, in Russ­ian, Vasi­ly Soloviev-Sedoi’s pop­u­lar song, Подмосковные Вечера. Now, most Russ­ian songs are sad and heart-tug­ging, but “Moscow Nights” is that, squared and cubed. It comes off best with a deep male voice — the most famous ver­sion is sung by Vladimir Troshin. But this woman was very effec­tive. By the time she was fin­ished, the whole, bustling mass of com­muters in the hall that led from the bus plat­forms to the trains was trans­fixed. Teenagers, who would nor­mal­ly turn up their iPods as they trudged obliv­i­ous­ly past any busker, were stop­ping to drop coins into the accordionist’s hat. The woman start­ed to dance as she sang. The crowd was mes­mer­ized. When the song end­ed, with moth­ers, chil­dren, busi­ness­men, stu­dents, and sub­way work­ers applaud­ing, the accor­dion­ists did not skip a beat, and launched imme­di­ate­ly into anoth­er song. Some opera tune, vague­ly famil­iar to me, but which I could not iden­ti­fy. The woman jumped into it instant­ly, singing the full aria in Ital­ian. More applause. Again, only a second’s hia­tus, and they were doing Bésame mucho, a song so corny that nor­mal­ly it’s unbear­able. But she gave it dignity.

Three songs, and then she obvi­ous­ly had to get to work, or what­ev­er. I spoke to her for a moment as we head­ed for the trains. Her accent was Kore­an. Did she speak Russ­ian? No, she said, she had mere­ly mem­o­rized the words pho­net­i­cal­ly. And she dis­ap­peared, name­less, with her gro­cery bags, down a crowd­ed esca­la­tor into the sil­ver cars that sped under the earth. Read more »

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 — The Ideology of Qutb

I just fin­ished read­ing Sayyid Qutb’s Ma’al­im fi-l-Tariq[“Mile­stones”]. This book is not avail­able in my pub­lic library sys­tem. Since it bears the same rela­tion­ship to the rise of Islamist total­i­tar­i­an­ism as Mein Kampf and The Com­mu­nist Man­i­festo do to Euro­pean total­i­tar­i­an­ism, you would think it would be smart for our libraries to have it. You can­not resist a move­ment of oppres­sion and aggres­sion by know­ing noth­ing about it. Mile­stonesis the ide­o­log­i­cal entry-point by which bored, spoilt-brat teenagers in Mus­lim fam­i­lies are drawn into the move­ment and con­vert­ed into zealots for death and destruc­tion. It should be read, grasped, and under­stood by sane peo­ple, so that its insan­i­ty can be coun­tered. Read more »

14737. (Joseph Boyden) Three Day Road

This book caught my eye because it’s heroes are from the coast of Hudson’s Bay, a nos­tal­gic place for me. Two Cree lads from Moose Fac­tory fight in the trench­es of World War I. Boy­den writes beau­ti­fully, is famil­iar with Cree cul­ture, and researched WWItrench war­fare with a historian’s skill. The book com­pares well with the clas­sic Cana­dian nov­el of WWI, Tim­o­thy Findlay’s The Wars. The Great War of 1914–1918 had a tremen­dous impact on Cana­da — far more than on the Unit­ed States. Cana­da was involved dur­ing the entire length of the war, had twice as many sol­diers on the front per-capi­ta as the U.S., and one Cana­dian fam­ily in five suf­fered a casu­alty. The war end­ed the desire of most Cana­di­ans to keep any seri­ous polit­i­cal ties with Britain, and scarred an entire gen­er­a­tion. So it isn’t sur­pris­ing that WWInov­els con­tinue to be writ­ten, and loom large in Cana­dian lit­er­a­ture. This is a wor­thy exam­ple. Read more »