Image of the month:

06-06-01 BLOG Image of the month

First-time listening for May, 2006

15668. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in F, H.XV:2
15669. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in B‑flat, H.XV:8
15670. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in F, H.XV:6
15671. (Fin­ger Eleven) Fin­ger Eleven
15672. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in D, H.XV:7
15673. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in A, H.XV:9
15674. (Franz Josef Haydn) Trio for Piano, Vio­lin and Cel­lo in E Minor, H.XV:12
15675. (Dmitri Shostakovich) Sym­pho­ny #2, Op.14
Read more »

READING – MAY 2006

14657. (Dan O’ Neill) The Fire­crack­er Boys
14658. [2] (William Shake­speare) Hen­ry V [play]
(Groff Con­klin –ed.) 5 Unearth­ly Visions:
. . . . 14659. (Eric Frank Rus­sell) Leg­work [sto­ry]
. . . . 14660. (Wal­ter M. Miller, Jr.) Con­di­tion­al­ly Human [sto­ry]
. . . . 14661. (Ray­mond Z. Gal­lun) Stamped Cau­tion [sto­ry]
. . . . 14662. (Damon Knight) Dio [sto­ry]
. . . . 14663. (Clif­ford D. Simak) Shad­ow World [sto­ry]
14664. (Michel Trem­blay) Quar­ante-qua­tre min­utes, quar­antes-qua­tre sec­on­des
Read more »

14671. (Barbara Haworth-Attard) Theories of Relativity

This is a juve­nile nov­el about a teenag­er liv­ing on the streets of an uniden­ti­fied Cana­di­an city. He is not, strict­ly speak­ing, a “run­away”, but the equal­ly com­mon “thrown away”, effec­tive­ly kicked out of a dis­func­tion­al sin­gle-fam­i­ly home. Unlike most books of this sort, Haworth-Attard’s treat­ment is nei­ther sen­ti­men­tal, nor preachy. This kind of street life is some­thing I know well, and I can vouch for the accu­ra­cy of most of the details. I found only a few small improb­a­bil­i­ties, and those sub­ject to inter­pre­ta­tion. The author has done her home­work. As a sto­ry, it reads well. The char­ac­ters are believ­able, and the use of Ein­stein as a leit­mo­tif is deft­ly han­dled. In recent years, fic­tion aimed at teenage read­ers is being writ­ten at a very high lev­el qual­i­ty, espe­cial­ly in Cana­da. Iron­i­cal­ly, one has to go to teenage fic­tion to find the hon­esty, seri­ous sub­ject mat­ter, and emo­tion­al inten­si­ty that are van­ish­ing from genre fic­tion aimed at adults.


Chubby Checker

06-05-26 LISTN Chubby CheckerErnest Evans (stage name “Chub­by Check­er”, a spoof of “Fats Domi­no”) is an exam­ple of a per­fectly com­pe­tent singer who might have had a long and high­ly respect­ed career, if not for the fatal pop­u­lar­ity of one hit tune. He is the only record­ing artist to have five albums in the Top 12 all at once. He is the only artist to have a song reach #1 twice, with the dread­ed “Twist”. I am lis­ten­ing to that sad lit­tle item on the orig­i­nal Park­way album, Your Twist Par­ty, in its 1961 Cana­di­an press­ing — a nice lit­tle rar­i­ty in my vinyl col­lec­tion. “The Twist” was noth­ing but a lit­tle dit­ty that trig­gered a brief dance craze, but it brand­ed Check­er as the musi­cal equiv­a­lent of hoola hoops, and he was nev­er per­mit­ted to sing much of any­thing else again, and nev­er tak­en seri­ously. This is the sad­dest aspect of show busi­ness. In some ways, utter fail­ure offers some dig­nity. To be briefly wor­shiped for some lame, triv­ial accom­plish­ment, then cast aside and mulched back into the earth must be utter­ly humil­i­at­ing. Checker’s singing was quite styl­ish, and some of his per­for­mances of rock-and-roll and show stan­dards on this album, such as “Ballin’ the Jack”, “Blue­berry Hill” and even “I Could Have Danced All Night” show that he could have been a long-term success.

14668. (Martin Brauen) Dreamworld Tibet

Of all places in the world, Tibet has attract­ed the most fan­tas­tic mys­ti­fi­ca­tion. Mar­tin Brauen’s book is a study of the bizarre images, dreams, and super­nat­ur­al fan­tasies that peo­ple have pro­ject­ed on this land. He explores the var­i­ous themes, start­ing with Renais­sance spec­u­la­tion about a hid­den Chris­t­ian king­dom in the Himalayas, and pro­ceed­ing through the fan­tasies of Madame Blavatsky and her Theosophists; the fic­tion­al Shangri-la of James Hilton’s Lost Hori­zon(and the won­der­ful Frank Capra film made from it); the racist pseu­do-sci­ence of the Nazis, who were fas­ci­nat­ed with Tibet; the absur­di­ties in the immense­ly pop­u­lar books by “Lob­sang Ram­pa”; to mod­ern adver­tiz­ing that exploits the image of the Dalai Lama, and cur­rent movies that still insist on see­ing only the reli­gious and “spir­i­tu­al” side of Tibetan life.

The author is not actu­al­ly angry about all this non­sense, but he is painful­ly aware that few peo­ple are inter­est­ed in the real­i­ty of Tibet, or the peo­ple of Tibet. Read more »

(Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man

06-05-21 VIEW (Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man pic 1

I hear (with a shud­der of hor­ror) that an Amer­i­can remake of this clas­sic British Ham­mer Stu­dios film is in pro­duc­tion. Yet anoth­er insult to a fine film that under­went more than its share of insults. The orig­i­nal was idi­ot­i­cal­ly mar­ket­ed as a shock-hor­ror pic­ture, ensur­ing that the peo­ple who would have appre­ci­at­ed it nev­er saw it and the peo­ple who saw it hat­ed it. Then it was bru­tal­ly re-cut in such a way as to make the film incom­pre­hen­si­ble. That hatch­et-job of a print cir­cu­lat­ed for years, an embar­rass­ment to the direc­tor and the stars who per­formed bril­liant­ly in it. The direc­tor even­tu­al­ly re-acquired the rights to it, and did his best to restore the orig­i­nal cut. I was present when the restored ver­sion was pre­miered in San Fran­cis­co, with the direc­tor in atten­dance. There have been two doc­u­men­taries made about this sad chain of events, nei­ther of which I’ve seen. If you rent the film, or see it on tele­vi­sion, beware of the butchered print, which still circulates.

06-05-21 VIEW (Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man pic 2The plot of The Wick­er Man is unique. A police­man (Edward Wood­ward) in the Scot­tish West High­lands gets a let­ter from a small island in the Hebrides. The island, under the influ­ence of a warm cur­rent, is famous for export­ing apples. The let­ter asserts that an island girl has gone miss­ing. When the police­man arrives on the island to inves­ti­gate, he dis­cov­ers two pecu­liar things: 1) every­one on the island is try­ing to 06-05-21 VIEW (Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man pic 3hide some­thing from him, and 2) the islanders have aban­doned Chris­tian­i­ty for a revived form of ancient pagan­ism. We are giv­en, from the begin­ning, a clear pic­ture of the policeman’s char­ac­ter. He is prig­gish, pious­ly reli­gious, and a vir­gin. He is utter­ly shocked by the hap­py-go-lucky lifestyle of the neo-pagan islanders, with their joy­ful sex­u­al­i­ty, bawdy pub songs, and chil­dren danc­ing naked. Much of the back­ground is explained in his inter­changes with the island’s Laird, bril­liant­ly played by Christo­pher Lee, and with the island school­teacher (Diane Cilen­to). The police­man suf­fers the ulti­mate temp­ta­tion to his piety (and vir­gin­i­ty) in the form of the rav­ish­ing­ly beau­ti­ful tavern-keeper’s daugh­ter (Britt Ekland), and is even­tu­al­ly drawn, step-by-step, into a trap that puts him into the Wick­er Man. The trick of the 06-05-21 VIEW (Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man pic 5film is to take a per­son that one instant­ly feels con­tempt for, and put him into a sit­u­a­tion where, even­tu­al­ly, you come to respect his view. I will not spoil the sto­ry for those who haven’t seen it. Suf­fice it to say that the tale reca­pit­u­lates what must have hap­pened a thou­sand times in a thou­sand vil­lages of ancient Europe, as Chris­tian­i­ty moved into and dis­placed pagan com­mu­ni­ties. The pagan lore pre­sent­ed in the film is rea­son­ably authen­tic, giv­en the expla­na­tion that it is pre­sent­ed as an arti­fi­cial revival. The celtic music played in the film is wonderful.

06-05-21 VIEW (Hardy 1973) The Wicker Man pic 4

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 — I Tremble For My Country

I trem­ble for my coun­try when­ev­er I see the bland, pasty face of our new Prime Min­is­ter, Stephen Harp­er, on tele­vi­sion. It’s not that Harp­er is dumb. He is actu­al­ly quite clever, and stands out dra­mat­i­cal­ly in a par­ty that is noto­ri­ous­ly filled with igno­ra­mus­es and bare­ly lit­er­ate yahoos. It’s not that Harp­er is incom­pe­tent. He has shown remark­able polit­i­cal acu­men, and he ran his elec­tion cam­paign bril­liant­ly. It’s not that he is dis­hon­est, or cor­rupt. I’ve seen no evi­dence of either. The prob­lem is not that he is “social­ly con­ser­v­a­tive” or pro­mot­ing a reli­gious agen­da. He shows no evi­dence of being any more social­ly con­ser­v­a­tive in his per­son­al views than the aver­age Cana­di­an. Besides, there is not much mar­ket for the social con­ser­v­a­tive agen­da in Cana­da, where peo­ple remain, on the whole, indi­vid­u­al­is­tic and fond of per­son­al lib­er­ty. Cana­di­ans find reli­gious zealotry dis­taste­ful. Read more »

(Coolidge 1985) Real Genius

06-05-16 VIEW (Coolidge 1985) Real GeniusI’m fond of this goofy 1980s com­edy about two whiz-kids who are scammed into work­ing on a mil­i­tary laser project by a mega­lo­ma­niac sci­en­tist. William Ather­ton played his patent­ed “ass­hole” vil­lain. Val Kilmer, who played the extro­verted stu­dent, went on to a high-pro­file film career. Gabriel Jar­ret, who played the intro­vert, did not (it was per­haps an omen that his name was mis­spelled in the cred­its). His role was writ­ten with a degree of psy­cho­log­i­cal real­ism, despite the absurd com­edy plot. For once, the love inter­est isn’t a bomb­shell babe who is “plain” because she wears glass­es and ties her hair back, then sud­denly whips them off and unties her hair in the final scene. Instead, she is rep­re­sented as extreme­ly geeky. Boy geek falls for girl geek in a rel­a­tively cred­i­ble way. For that alone, the film deserves some kind of award.

Monday, May 15, 2006 — French Canadian Swearing

The Catholic Church in Que­bec has sur­prised every­one with a pecu­liar pub­lic­i­ty cam­paign. They have pur­chased space on bill­boards, bus-stops, and oth­er adver­tis­ing places, in order to dis­play swear-words. This requires some expla­na­tion. French Cana­di­an swear­ing is the lamest on Earth. Don’t expect any­thing like the baroque splen­dour of Mex­i­can swear­ing, or the earthy imagery in Russ­ian curs­es, or even the repet­i­tive sex­u­al obses­sions we are famil­iar with in Eng­lish. The basic French Cana­di­an swear words are dis­tort­ed forms of the words for the arti­cles used in a mass: “taber­na­cle”, “chal­ice”, “host”, “sac­risty”.

How­ev­er, this can­not be explained by any reli­gious sen­si­tiv­i­ty. French Cana­da, espe­cial­ly in Que­bec, is one of the most sec­u­lar soci­eties on the plan­et. Church atten­dance is very low in Cana­da, but by far the low­est in Que­bec. The over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of French Cana­di­ans have lit­tle or no inter­est in orga­nized reli­gion, though many will say they have some pri­vate, per­son­al faith, unin­flu­enced by any church. Most peo­ple have no idea what­so­ev­er what any of these “swear words” mean. If you catch your fin­ger in car door, you say “tabernac’ ”, or “taber­nache”. It doesn’t call up any image. It’s just a mean­ing­less word. The aver­age per­son, if asked to explain its ori­gin, prob­a­bly wouldn’t be able to tell you. By con­trast, nobody who swears in Eng­lish is unaware of the mean­ings of the swear words. Read more »