Category Archives: B - READING - Page 26

17175. (Ram Sharan Sharma) India’s Ancient Past

For a long time, the most read­er-friend­ly intro­duc­tion to the his­to­ry of ancient India (i.e. any­thing before the Gup­ta peri­od) has been the first vol­ume of Romi­la Tha­par’s His­to­ry of India. But that book was pub­lished back in 1966, and advances in archae­ol­o­gy and schol­ar­ship have out­dat­ed it. I would now rec­om­mend this book as a con­tem­po­rary sub­sti­tute. It’s a good place for some­one to start their read­ing on the sub­ject, though I sug­gest that they read it in con­junc­tion with Wikipedia entries on most of its main topics.

I have some prob­lems with Shar­ma’s work. He embraces some dubi­ous notions of “social evo­lu­tion”, he sees noth­ing of inter­est in the “trib­al” and non-Vedic or non-Dra­vid­i­an peo­ples of India except their inevitable con­ver­sion to “civ­i­liza­tion”, and he writes absolute­ly noth­ing about Indi­a’s inter­ac­tion with South­east Asia. This last stands in con­trast to his lengthy dis­cus­sions of Indi­an trade, polit­i­cal, and cul­tur­al inter­ac­tions with Cen­tral Asia, and even the Roman Empire. But impor­tant as these were, India nev­er export­ed much of its cul­ture to these areas, where­as in South­east Asia, Indi­an cul­ture was export­ed on a gigan­tic scale. Hin­du and Indo-Bud­dhist king­doms were set up in places as far as Viet­nam. Indi­a’s east­ward trade links were every bit, and per­haps more, impor­tant than its west­ward ones. Shar­ma hard­ly men­tions them. But despite these weak­ness­es, the book remains a good intro­duc­tion to a sub­ject with which every edu­cat­ed per­son in the world should have some basic familiarity.

READING JANUARY 2009

17078. (David Liss) A Con­spir­a­cy of Paper
17079. (Dar­rell Marke­witz) [in blog Ham­mered Out Bits] Black­smithing Skills in the Viking Age 
. . . . . [arti­cle]
17080. (Lithi­um Cola) [in blog Dai­ly Kos] Hits and Miss­es 2008 [arti­cle]
17081. (Lithi­um Cola) [in blog Dai­ly Kos] Of ICBMs, Sesame Street, and Arro­gance [arti­cle]
17082. (Lebanon Dai­ly Star) Beirut Seems to Have Upper Hand Against Extrem­ists [arti­cle]
17083. (Juan Cole) [in blog Informed Com­ment] Top Ten Good News Sto­ries in the Muslim 
. . . . . World, 2008 {That Nobody Noticed} [arti­cle]
Read more »

(Lucian of Samosata) Selected Satires of Lucian [ed. & tr. Lionel Casson]

09-01- Lucian seems to have been the Kurt Von­negut of the Roman World, pok­ing fun at philoso­phers and the clas­sics of Greek lit­er­a­ture with a cheer­ful cyn­i­cism. Though he was an Assyr­i­an from Mesopotamia, liv­ing in the sec­ond cen­tu­ry A.D., he wrote in Clas­si­cal Greek (the equiv­a­lent of some­one today writ­ing in Eliz­a­bethan Eng­lish). His most famous work is the True His­to­ry, some­times list­ed as the first sci­ence fic­tion sto­ry, since it incor­po­rates a trip to the moon and the sun, and an inter­plan­e­tary war. But it’s real­ly a shag­gy-dog sto­ry intend­ed to spoof the creduli­ty of Homer and Herodotus. The nar­ra­tor repeat­ed­ly tells you some­thing absurd, then says he won’t tell you anoth­er, more absurd detail because you won’t believe him. It employs tech­niques of farce and bur­lesque lat­er per­fect­ed by Baron Mün­chausen and Mark Twain. Lucius the Ass, the attri­bu­tion of which is occa­sion­al­ly ques­tioned, is notice­ably dif­fer­ent in style, and con­tains pas­sages that are obvi­ous­ly intend­ed to be read as porn. The same sto­ry (the hero is trans­formed into a don­key: trou­ble fol­lows) was also told by Apuleius. It’s inter­est­ing in that it draws atten­tion to the suf­fer­ing of an ani­mal, some­thing to which most Roman writ­ers were obliv­i­ous. Most of the oth­er pieces are com­ic dia­logues in which the Gods are spoofed in all-too-human terms. Lucian seems to have con­sid­ered all reli­gion char­la­tanism, and did not have much good to say about philoso­phers, either. Chris­tians are sat­i­rized in The Death of Pere­gri­nus. The auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal My Dream reveals that a stone-mason’s son from a back­wa­ter part of the Empire could edu­cate him­self into a suc­cess. Lucian was able to set­tle down and write spoofs after a career as a lec­tur­er that took him across the Empire. A mod­ern read­er with a rou­tine expo­sure to Greek mythol­o­gy will get at least half of Lucian’s allu­sions, though not, of course, his puns. This anthol­o­gy con­tains less than half of his known works. Read more »

17083. (Juan Cole) [in blog Informed Comment] Top Ten Good News Stories in the Muslim World, 2008 [That Nobody Noticed] [article]

Steve Muhlberg­er’s site exposed me to the blog­ging of Juan Cole, who is a Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan his­to­ri­an spe­cial­iz­ing in con­tem­po­rary Mid­dle East­ern and South Asian stud­ies. He counts as one of the major his­to­ri­ans of, and pol­i­cy experts on the Mid­dles East. His blog, Informed Com­ment, is the best source of insight­ful com­ment and hard-to-find cru­cial infor­ma­tion in this field that I’ve seen, any­where. I rec­om­mend check­ing out this entry, since it exem­pli­fies his abil­i­ty to sort out the “big pic­ture” from a bliz­zard of data. I was not sur­prised to learn that Cole is an avid Sci­ence Fic­tion fan .…it seems that all today’s best his­to­ri­ans are.

17078. (David Liss) A Conspiracy of Paper

This is an excel­lent, enter­tain­ing nov­el set in Eng­land in 1720, at the time of the “South Sea Bub­ble.” This was a finan­cial cri­sis caused by a com­plex stock mar­ket swin­dle, which was cooked up by an alliance of pri­vate and gov­ern­ment inter­ests. Read­ing the book today, now that we have wit­nessed the biggest armed rob­bery in human his­to­ry, in the form of the Wall Street bailouts, is a more piquant expe­ri­ence than it would have been if I had picked it up when it was pub­lished, eight years ago. [Last Novem­ber, I reviewed an inter­est­ing biog­ra­phy of John Law, the man at the heart of the finan­cial melt­down of France that occurred in the same year.] Read more »

READINGDECEMBER 2008

16974. (Van­ni Bel­tra­mi) Il Sahara cen­tro-ori­en­tale Dal­la Preis­to­ria ai tem­pi dei noma­di Tubu
. . . . . [The Cen­tral-Ori­en­tal Sahara From Pre­his­to­ry to the Times of the Nomadic Tubus]
16975. Hit­tite doc­u­ment: Apol­o­gy of Ḫattušili III [Dona­tion of the Estate of Arma-Tarḫunta to
. . . . . the Cult of Šauš­ga of Šamuḫa]
16976. (Françoise Thibaut) Le cheva­lier Jean Charles de Bor­da, sci­en­tifique et navigateur
. . . . . [arti­cle]
16977. (Doug Saun­ders) This is India’s 9/11? Think Again [arti­cle]
16978. (Ufuk Tavkul) A Good Sam­ple For Cul­tur­al Dif­fu­sion: A Hero Who Car­ries The
. . . . . Char­ac­ter­is­tics Of Prophet David In The Nart Epos Of Karachay-Balkar People ―
. . . . . Nart Debet, The Smith [arti­cle]
16979. (Arkady & Boris Stru­gats­ki) Hard to Be a God
Read more »

17077. (Debra Hamel) Trying Neaira, the True Story of a Courtesan’s Scandalous Life in Ancient Greece

Using the frag­men­tary evi­dence of a tri­al which took place in Athens c.340 B.C., Debra Hamel cre­ates a vivid pic­ture of the place of women in Clas­si­cal Greek soci­ety. This book is entire­ly free of post-mod­ern plat­i­tudes and jar­gon, and con­cen­trates on help­ing the read­er visu­al­ize and empathize with the past. Along the way, many col­lat­er­al issues, such as just how ancient lit­i­ga­tion worked in real life, and what sex­u­al laws and cus­toms meant for real peo­ple, are illu­mi­nat­ed. I would strong­ly rec­om­mend this book to any­one who wants to dig deep­er than the stan­dard bat­tles-and-big-shots approach to Greek his­to­ry. This was a delight­ful Christ­mas gift from my friend Ruta Muhlberger.

17055. (Gene Sharp) From Dictatorship To Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation

It’s odd that I haven’t read Gene Sharp’s work until now. I’ve known about him for years, and I’ve been aware of his ideas at sec­ond hand. He has been pre­oc­cu­pied with the issue of how peo­ple can resist or over­throw dic­ta­tor­ships for longer than I have (and that’s say­ing quite a bit). His ideas are fair­ly close to my own, and come from sim­i­lar influ­ences. So I’m embar­rassed to say that I have neglect­ed read­ing his works, an error that I will hasti­ly correct.

Unlike most aca­d­e­mics, Sharp has a com­mon-sense grasp of what is pos­si­ble and what is not, what is rel­e­vant and what is not, and what works and what does not. This short work, which he keeps in the pub­lic domain and encour­ages to be trans­lat­ed, is an extreme­ly use­ful vade­me­cum for those who want to over­throw dic­ta­tor­ships. He urges the use of what he calls “Polit­i­cal Defi­ance”, a strate­gic form of planned non-vio­lent resis­tance. As he points out, over-reliance on vio­lence, rather than on more sophis­ti­cat­ed tech­niques of resis­tance, does not have a good record of suc­cess. This doc­u­ment has influ­enced democ­ra­cy advo­cates in a num­ber of quar­ters. I strong­ly rec­om­mend it.

17043. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Condorcet’s Advice to His Daughter [written in hiding, 1794] 17044. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Condorcet’s Testament [written in hiding, 1794] 17045. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Vie de Voltaire, par M. le marquis de Condorcet; suivie des mémoires de Voltaire, écrits par lui-mème.

I’ve been read­ing a lot of Con­dorcet, late­ly, in dribs and drabs. He was not a great writer, or par­tic­u­lar­ly enter­tain­ing, but what he had to say is worth pay­ing atten­tion to. He was pri­mar­i­ly a math­e­mati­cian and sci­en­tist, who found him­self con­tin­u­ous­ly caught up in polit­i­cal issues (for which he would ulti­mate­ly pay with his life, in Robe­spier­re’s ter­ror), and he was a shy, social­ly inept man with no tal­ent for cul­ti­vat­ing celebri­ty. Con­dorcet is a much more impor­tant fig­ure than most think. I have else­where com­plained that the actu­al bal­ance of intel­lec­tu­al influ­ences in the Enlight­en­ment and the peri­od of the Amer­i­can and French rev­o­lu­tions is prob­a­bly not much like the image of it that most of us have inher­it­ed from text­books, or old chest­nuts like Rousseau and Rev­o­lu­tion. The small atten­tion paid to Con­dorcet illus­trates this. Recent­ly there has been a mod­est growth of inter­est in him because of his writ­ings on the math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ry of vot­ing, and its rel­e­vance to mod­ern bal­lot reform. In France, he is bet­ter known as a the­o­rist of pub­lic edu­ca­tion. But, still the inter­est is rel­a­tive­ly small, con­sid­er­ing the degree of his actu­al influ­ence. Read more »

17015. (Luc Laeven & Fabian Valencia) IMF Working Paper: Systemic Banking Crises, A New Database [report]

This a work­ing doc­u­ment issued this week by the IMF. It’s essen­tial­ly an inter­nal report by their sta­tis­ti­cians ana­lyz­ing all nation­al liq­uid­i­ty crises that have occurred since 1970. There are things worth call­ing atten­tion to, in it: There were 124 “sys­temic bank­ing crises” spread across dozens of coun­tries between 1970 and 2007. Almost every nation on Earth is in the list — except Cana­da. We’ve nev­er had one. Read more »