Wednesday, May 14, 2008 — Steven Muhlberger on Canadian Historians; Romeo Dallaire

Two inter­est­ing items over at Muhlberg­er’s Ear­ly His­to­ry. One dis­cuss­es the pecu­liar psy­chol­o­gy of Cana­di­an his­to­ri­ans who can’t quite make them­selves believe that Cana­di­an his­to­ry is wor­thy of being dis­cussed in a world con­text, and, react to the thought with the tit­ters of Vic­to­ri­an spin­sters spot­ting a naked bot­tom. [ The French Rev­o­lu­tion and Cana­da — laugh­able?] .Then he dis­cuss­es Sen­a­tor Romeo Dal­laire’s com­ments. blast­ing our gov­ern­ment for its hyp­o­crit­i­cal and immoral pol­i­cy regard­ing Omar Khadar, the Cana­di­an child sol­dier long held at Git­mo against all stan­dards of law and decen­cy. [Rule of law and human rights — only when con­ve­nie…] Spot on. I, too, looked on with dis­gust as our moral­ly puny Sec­re­tary of State, Jason Ken­ney (Con­ser­v­a­tive) gave a fatu­ous lec­ture on the nature of evil — to a man whose per­son­al knowl­edge of geno­cide, and whose eth­i­cal cre­den­tials stand as far above him as the Hub­ble Tele­scope stands above an ant on the shore of the Dead Sea. When Mr. Ken­ney spout­ed the pre­dictable “the end jus­ti­fies the means” clap­trap beloved by scoundrels, Dal­laire looked him straight in the eye and said: “If you want a black and white, and I’m only too pre­pared to give it to you, absolute­ly. You’re either with the law or now with the law. You’re either guilty or you’re not.”

16217. (Bonnie Murray) Li Paviyóñ di Michif

This is a children’s book pub­lished in the Michif lan­guage. It’s quite a rar­i­ty, since less than a thou­sand peo­ple can speak the lan­guage. But the Métis com­mu­ni­ty in Man­i­to­ba is deter­mined to pass the lan­guage to the next gen­er­a­tion. Michif is one of the most pecu­liar lan­guages on the plan­et. It devel­oped in West­ern Cana­da among the Métis peo­ple, and it com­bines a basi­cal­ly Cree gram­mar and verb sys­tem with many French nouns, adjec­tives and prepo­si­tions. A few stray Eng­lish and Gael­ic terms are in there, too. It does not fol­low the pat­tern of any oth­er known cre­ole, pid­gin, or trade lan­guage. For exam­ple, it retains intact the extreme­ly com­plex Cree verb mor­phol­o­gy, which is the sort of thing that’s usu­al­ly the first to go in a mixed lan­guage. Michif is a lin­guis­tic puz­zle, with­out obvi­ous par­al­lel in any oth­er lin­guis­tic or social sit­u­a­tion. The only oth­er lan­guage that is sim­i­lar is Bungee, spo­ken by a very few Métis, in which Gael­ic replaces French as the main source of nouns and adjec­tives. There are some peo­ple known to have been per­fect­ly flu­ent in both Michif and Bungee — for exam­ple, James Isbis­ter, a farmer in Saskatchewan who was select­ed as one of the four del­e­gates (along with Gabriel Dumont) to recall Louis Riel from Mon­tana to rep­re­sent the Métis, was known to be flu­ent in both Michif and Bungee, as well as Cree, Eng­lish, French, Gael­ic, and the com­plete­ly unre­lat­ed (and noto­ri­ous­ly dif­fi­cult) Dené lan­guage. Read more »

(Ceylan 2002) Uzak [Distant]

This is a slow-paced psy­cho­log­i­cal dra­ma, styl­is­ti­cal­ly influ­enced by Tarkovsky. It holds atten­tion because the act­ing is superb, the psy­cho­log­i­cal nuances real­is­tic. One scene, for exam­ple, involv­ing a lost watch, stands out for the fine-tuned per­for­mances of the two lead actors, Muzaf­fer Ozdemir and Emin Toprak. Sad­ly, Toprak died in a car crash short­ly after learn­ing he had received his award at Cannes. The cin­e­matog­ra­phy is first rate, with Istan­bul buried in snow form­ing a grey back­drop to the claus­tro­pho­bic inte­ri­or shots and tight­ly repressed rela­tion­ships of the char­ac­ters. It’s a grim film, but the sym­pa­thy of the script makes this tol­er­a­ble to the view­er, and the cam­era con­veys both the beau­ty and the bleak­ness of a Turk­ish win­ter.

Monday, May 12, 2008 — What Is Progress? What Is Progressive?

In a speech, today, Canada’s Prime Min­is­ter, Stephen Harp­er out­lined his plan to force our coun­try down the same path to bank­rupt­cy and self-destruc­tion that the Unit­ed States has relent­less­ly pur­sued over the last gen­er­a­tion. It’s first pur­pose is to destroy our domes­tic indus­try (espe­cial­ly in Ontario) and reduce us to abject sub­mis­sion to “Big Ener­gy”, the glob­al com­mu­nism of oil sheiks, dic­ta­tors and multi­na­tion­al gang­sters. It’s sec­ondary pur­pose is to esca­late eco­nom­i­cal­ly par­a­lyz­ing mil­i­tary spend­ing, and make us even more avail­able as mer­ce­nary canon fod­der to our glob­al mas­ters. Canada’s indus­tri­al base is rapid­ly dis­in­te­grat­ing. Just today, the clo­sure of anoth­er major indus­tri­al facil­i­ty in Ontario was announced. Canada’s cur­rent­ly “strong” econ­o­my is being propped up by oil and gas pro­duc­tion, and pros­per­i­ty is con­fined to the exportable resource regions. Oil, gas, min­ing. The Con­ser­v­a­tive regime is forc­ing us back into the pathet­ic “hew­ers of wood and draw­ers of water” sta­tus that it took us a cen­tu­ry of strug­gle to free our­selves from. The decade of bal­anced bud­gets and sur­plus­es gen­er­at­ed by Lib­er­al gov­ern­ments has been can­celed out ― pil­laged by the Con­ser­v­a­tive regime ― and we will soon be plung­ing into debt. This is the result of import­ing the obnox­ious, free­dom-hat­ing Con­ser­v­a­tive ide­ol­o­gy that has crip­pled and dis­hon­oured the Unit­ed States ― an ide­ol­o­gy that would far more accu­rate­ly be named “Neo-Com­mu­nism”. Read more »

16215. (Edward J. Vajda) Yeniseian Peoples and Languages; 16216. (Edward J. Vajda) Ket

08-05-12 READ 16215. (Edward J. Vajda) Yeniseian Peoples and Languages; 16216. (Edward J. Vajda) Ket pic 1

Some mod­ern Ket men.

Back in the mid-1980’s, I became very inter­ested in the native cul­tures of Siberia, part­ly because they have many sim­i­lar­i­ties with the native cul­tures of north­ern Cana­da. I went so far as to cor­re­spond with sev­eral peo­ple in Siberia, some­thing which was just then begin­ning to be pos­si­ble. This was nec­es­sary, because there was then very lit­tle infor­ma­tion avail­able in Eng­lish or French about this region, most of which had been sealed off by the Com­mu­nist regime for most of the cen­tury. Some very nasty things hap­pened there, not the least of which was the whole­sale sup­pres­sion and destruc­tion of native cul­tures. I dug up the small num­ber of rel­e­vant books and arti­cles that I could, but there wasn’t much to be found. Read more »

The Alternate World of Zarzuela

Spain and Cat­alo­nia have always stood apart from the main­stream of Euro­pean cul­ture, doing things after their own fash­ion. Among these dis­tinc­tions was their fond­ness, over sev­eral cen­turies, for zarzuela, an alter­na­tive to Opera, with its own styles and con­ven­tions. While zarzue­las were staged as ear­ly as the mid-sev­en­­teenth cen­tury, they reached their apogee of pop­u­lar­ity and artis­tic glo­ry in the ear­ly 20th cen­tury, and were still going strong decades after opera had ceased to be broad­ly pop­u­lar. There are dis­tinc­tive styles of zarzuela sung in Cata­lan (sar­suela) and in Basque (zartzue­lak). The roman­zasof this kind of music-dra­ma are the equiv­a­lent of opera’s arias.

08-05-11 LISTN The Alternate World of Zarzuela

Read more »

(Hernández 1999) Lisboa [Lisbon]

A well-craft­ed sus­pense film employ­ing some of the for­mu­las of Hitch­cock. Despite the title, it’s a Span­ish film. The main char­ac­ter is a Por­tuguese video dis­trib­u­tor, on a car trip from Spain, going home. He picks up a mys­te­ri­ous woman, and gets tan­gled in a web of mur­der. Well-trod­den mate­r­i­al, but direc­tor Her­nan­dez han­dles it well, and the odd­ly low-key end­ing is original.

16200. (Peter Bellwood) The First Farmers

I’ve been read­ing every­thing I can find on this sub­ject for months, now, and this is by far the best book I’ve seen. It is mod­i­fy­ing some of my views, and re-enforc­ing oth­ers. It will take me some time to absorb and reflect on the mate­r­ial, here, so I will not leap to a con­clu­sive judg­ment until it has been well-mulled.What­ever your views on the sub­ject of the neolith­ic tran­si­tion to agri­cul­ture, this book is essen­tial read­ing. It brings togeth­er the main blocks of evi­dence (from archae­l­og­y, lin­guis­tics, genet­ics, pale­o­cli­ma­tol­ogy, skele­tal anthro­pol­ogy, plant and ani­mal biol­ogy) in a bal­anced and sys­tem­atic way. In most cas­es, Bell­wood lets the evi­dence speak for itself, and draws con­clu­sions only when they seem com­pelled by the facts. I think he is miss­ing a major the­o­ret­i­cal ele­ment, if my hunch­es remain con­sis­tent with the evi­dence as it stands. But I think this will require more sat­u­ra­tion in the exist­ing lit­er­a­ture, before I start mouthing off. I’m an ama­teur and an out­sider. This can be an advan­tage, in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, as the his­tory of sci­ence has shown, but it is also very easy for an ama­teur to drift into crankery — which I hope nev­er to do.

(LaBute 2006) The Wicker Man —- ludicrous remake

“Oh, no! Not the BEES!!”

Okay, I’ve final­ly seen it. When I heard there was an Amer­i­can remake of the clas­sic 1973 British filmI knew it would have to be bad. When it came out, every­one who saw it assured me that it was not just ter­ri­ble, but an absolute atroc­i­ty. But still, I was not pre­pared for how unbe­liev­ably bad this film is. It’s sick­en­ing­ly, loath­some­ly, hor­ri­bly, hideous­ly, insult­ing­ly bad. Not even the hilar­i­ous sight of Nicholas Cage punch­ing an Evil Wic­can Fem­i­nist while dressed in a bear suit can make it seem charm­ing­ly bad, like an Ed Wood movie, or Robot Mon­ster. The insult to the orig­i­nal film is sim­ply too mon­strous to per­mit that kind of plea­sure. This was made by morons who under­stand noth­ing. The best way to watch it, if you must, would be to be dead drunk, stoned out of your mind, or, bet­ter yet, in a clin­i­cal coma.

16197. (Frances Stonor Saunders) The Devil’s Broker ― Seeking Gold, God, and Glory in 14th Century Italy

This is a very well-writ­ten study of the role of the Eng­lish con­dot­tieriwho were the Hal­ibur­ton Gang of four­teenth cen­tury Italy. It focus­es on the char­ac­ter of John Hawk­wood, a minor Eng­lish knight who rose to lead­er­ship among the mer­ce­nary armies that were cast loose on France and Italy, when the Hun­dred Years War entered a lull. Saun­ders’ prose is excel­lent, and evoca­tive, her grasp of the evi­dence is strong, and she has a com­mon-sense vision of the real life behind the doc­u­ments. Read more »