READING – DECEMBER 2008

16974. (Van­ni Bel­tra­mi) Il Sahara cen­tro-ori­en­tale Dal­la Preis­to­ria ai tem­pi dei noma­di Tubu
. . . . . [The Cen­tral-Ori­en­tal Sahara From Pre­his­to­ry to the Times of the Nomadic Tubus]
16975. Hit­tite doc­u­ment: Apol­o­gy of Ḫattušili III [Dona­tion of the Estate of Arma-Tarḫunta to
. . . . . the Cult of Šauš­ga of Šamuḫa]
16976. (Françoise Thibaut) Le cheva­lier Jean Charles de Bor­da, sci­en­tifique et nav­i­ga­teur
. . . . . [arti­cle]
16977. (Doug Saun­ders) This is India’s 9/11? Think Again [arti­cle]
16978. (Ufuk Tavkul) A Good Sam­ple For Cul­tur­al Dif­fu­sion: A Hero Who Car­ries The
. . . . . Char­ac­ter­is­tics Of Prophet David In The Nart Epos Of Karachay-Balkar Peo­ple ―
. . . . . Nart Debet, The Smith [arti­cle]
16979. (Arkady & Boris Stru­gats­ki) Hard to Be a God
Read more »

17077. (Debra Hamel) Trying Neaira, the True Story of a Courtesan’s Scandalous Life in Ancient Greece

Using the frag­men­tary evi­dence of a tri­al which took place in Athens c.340 B.C., Debra Hamel cre­ates a vivid pic­ture of the place of women in Clas­si­cal Greek soci­ety. This book is entire­ly free of post-mod­ern plat­i­tudes and jar­gon, and con­cen­trates on help­ing the read­er visu­al­ize and empathize with the past. Along the way, many col­lat­er­al issues, such as just how ancient lit­i­ga­tion worked in real life, and what sex­u­al laws and cus­toms meant for real peo­ple, are illu­mi­nat­ed. I would strong­ly rec­om­mend this book to any­one who wants to dig deep­er than the stan­dard bat­tles-and-big-shots approach to Greek his­to­ry. This was a delight­ful Christ­mas gift from my friend Ruta Muhlberger.

17055. (Gene Sharp) From Dictatorship To Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation

It’s odd that I haven’t read Gene Sharp’s work until now. I’ve known about him for years, and I’ve been aware of his ideas at sec­ond hand. He has been pre­oc­cu­pied with the issue of how peo­ple can resist or over­throw dic­ta­tor­ships for longer than I have (and that’s say­ing quite a bit). His ideas are fair­ly close to my own, and come from sim­i­lar influ­ences. So I’m embar­rassed to say that I have neglect­ed read­ing his works, an error that I will hasti­ly correct.

Unlike most aca­d­e­mics, Sharp has a com­mon-sense grasp of what is pos­si­ble and what is not, what is rel­e­vant and what is not, and what works and what does not. This short work, which he keeps in the pub­lic domain and encour­ages to be trans­lat­ed, is an extreme­ly use­ful vade­me­cum for those who want to over­throw dic­ta­tor­ships. He urges the use of what he calls “Polit­i­cal Defi­ance”, a strate­gic form of planned non-vio­lent resis­tance. As he points out, over-reliance on vio­lence, rather than on more sophis­ti­cat­ed tech­niques of resis­tance, does not have a good record of suc­cess. This doc­u­ment has influ­enced democ­ra­cy advo­cates in a num­ber of quar­ters. I strong­ly rec­om­mend it.

17043. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Condorcet’s Advice to His Daughter [written in hiding, 1794] 17044. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Condorcet’s Testament [written in hiding, 1794] 17045. (Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat de Condorcet) Vie de Voltaire, par M. le marquis de Condorcet; suivie des mémoires de Voltaire, écrits par lui-mème.

I’ve been read­ing a lot of Con­dorcet, late­ly, in dribs and drabs. He was not a great writer, or par­tic­u­lar­ly enter­tain­ing, but what he had to say is worth pay­ing atten­tion to. He was pri­mar­i­ly a math­e­mati­cian and sci­en­tist, who found him­self con­tin­u­ous­ly caught up in polit­i­cal issues (for which he would ulti­mate­ly pay with his life, in Robe­spier­re’s ter­ror), and he was a shy, social­ly inept man with no tal­ent for cul­ti­vat­ing celebri­ty. Con­dorcet is a much more impor­tant fig­ure than most think. I have else­where com­plained that the actu­al bal­ance of intel­lec­tu­al influ­ences in the Enlight­en­ment and the peri­od of the Amer­i­can and French rev­o­lu­tions is prob­a­bly not much like the image of it that most of us have inher­it­ed from text­books, or old chest­nuts like Rousseau and Rev­o­lu­tion. The small atten­tion paid to Con­dorcet illus­trates this. Recent­ly there has been a mod­est growth of inter­est in him because of his writ­ings on the math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ry of vot­ing, and its rel­e­vance to mod­ern bal­lot reform. In France, he is bet­ter known as a the­o­rist of pub­lic edu­ca­tion. But, still the inter­est is rel­a­tive­ly small, con­sid­er­ing the degree of his actu­al influ­ence. Read more »

Beethoven’s “Waldstein” Sonata

08-12-14 LISTN Beethoven's Waldstein SonataBeethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 21 in C major, Op.53, known as the “Wald­stein”, is my favourite of the lot. It first came to my atten­tion when I read Edgar Pang­born’s neglect­ed sci­ence fic­tion mas­ter­piece, A Mir­ror For Observers. Pang­born, a com­pos­er and pianist him­self, used a per­for­mance of the piece as a key device in the plot. It remains one of the pieces I play most often.

It starts soft­ly, with a series of rhyth­mic chords devoid of melody, then plays around teas­ing­ly, until the sec­ond sub­ject, a warm E‑major melody comes in. From there, it goes through many odd mod­u­la­tions, twists, and mood changes, right up to the sparkling coda (it was writ­ten in 1804, right when Beethoven was busi­ly toss­ing the Clas­si­cal rules out the win­dow). The short, con­tem­pla­tive sec­ond move­ment explores every ambigu­ous and unclas­si­fi­able emo­tion you can feel.

The final move­ment is marked alle­gro mod­er­a­to, and poor pianists often spoil it by play­ing the begin­ning too fast. This spoils the effect of the prestis­si­mo finale. Andras Schiff does it right. That end­ing sneaks up on you like a cat, and pounces. In no oth­er sonata does the piano sound so much like an entire orches­tra: pas­sages mim­ic strings, horns, tympany.The arpe­gios aren’t cake dec­o­ra­tions: each one is essen­tial to the rea­son­ing of the piece. There is every Beethoven in it: the fist-shak­ing Beethoven, the sweet Beethoven, the con­tem­pla­tive Beethoven, the trick­ster Beethoven. Time and again there are moments of pro­found beau­ty, includ­ing every god­dam note of the coda.

I would count this sonata as one of the very great­est piano works of all time.

17015. (Luc Laeven & Fabian Valencia) IMF Working Paper: Systemic Banking Crises, A New Database [report]

This a work­ing doc­u­ment issued this week by the IMF. It’s essen­tial­ly an inter­nal report by their sta­tis­ti­cians ana­lyz­ing all nation­al liq­uid­i­ty crises that have occurred since 1970. There are things worth call­ing atten­tion to, in it: There were 124 “sys­temic bank­ing crises” spread across dozens of coun­tries between 1970 and 2007. Almost every nation on Earth is in the list — except Cana­da. We’ve nev­er had one. Read more »

17003. (Günter Hägele & Friedrich Pukelsheim) Llull’s Writings On Electoral Systems [article]

08-12-10 READ 17003. (Günter Hägele & Friedrich Pukelsheim) Llull’s Writings On Electoral Systems [article]

Ramon Lull, Medieval poly­math from the Bal­aer­ic Islands

This impor­tant paper on medieval elec­toral the­o­ry does­n’t come from his­to­ri­ans, but from math­e­mati­cians. Their inter­est is that the medieval Cata­lan schol­ar Ramon Lull (or Llull) (b.1232‑d.1315) antic­i­pat­ed the math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ries of elec­toral sys­tems of the eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry known to us through Bor­da and Con­dorcet. Appar­ent­ly, recent­ly dis­cov­ered medieval man­u­scripts reveal that Lull had devel­oped a quite sim­i­lar the­o­ry. This inter­ests me, of course, as the his­to­ry of elec­toral sys­tems is part of what I explore, but more impor­tant than the math­e­mat­i­cal accom­plish­ment is the impli­ca­tion that monas­tic insti­tu­tions in the Mid­dle Ages took elec­tion pro­ce­dures very seriously.

17001. (Ethan B. Russo, et al.) Phytochemical and Genetic Analyses of Ancient Cannabis from Central Asia [article]

Cana­dian Press car­ried an item about the pub­li­ca­tion of this paper, which was sub­se­quently picked up by oth­er news agen­cies. The folks at CP appar­ently scan the Jour­nal of Exper­i­men­tal Botany on a reg­u­lar basis. Good on them. The dis­cov­ery of a 2,700 year old mar­i­juana stash, which 18 sci­en­tists sub­jected to thor­ough analy­sis, is a cheer­ful item of news in these gloomy times. Appar­ently, it was potent chron­ic, clear­ly grown for its psy­chotropic qual­i­ties (female only, high in THC) and accom­pa­nied by appro­pri­ate para­pher­na­lia. Read more »

17000. [4] (Walt Whitman) Leaves of Grass: Children of Adam [verse]

If any­thing is sacred the human body is sacred - Whit­man08-12-07 READ 17000. [4] (Walt Whitman) Leaves of Grass Children of Adam [verse]

In today’s prud­ish, pruri­ent and bil­ious North Amer­i­can cul­ture, Walt Whit­man is as sub­ver­sive as he was in the 19th cen­tu­ry. In “I Sing the Body Elec­tric”, prob­a­bly the best poem in the Chil­dren of Adamsec­tion of Leaves of Grass, he pro­claimed his per­son­al man­i­festo: look at the bod­ies of human beings, if you want to see the divine, the sacred, and moral truth. The rant­i­ng, per­verse ped­dlers of pho­ny “val­ues” — the pul­pit screech­ers and Con­ser­v­a­tive haters of life — know noth­ing of truth, beau­ty, or moral­i­ty. There is more moral­i­ty in a sin­gle line of Leaves of Grassthan in a mil­lion ser­mons of church­ly bullshit.

(Huston 1956) Moby Dick

Moby DickCrit­ics were not kind to John Hus­ton’s 1956 film­ing of Melville’s sym­bol­ic mas­ter­piece, but it has much to com­mend it. Gre­go­ry Peck looked awk­ward in the role of Ahab, but in the scenes where he whips his crew into a col­lec­tive fren­zy (where Star­buck sees “a mad­man beget more mad­men”) he was very effec­tive. Ray Brad­bury wrote the script, and I think it one of his most bril­liant accom­plish­ments, for it remains very true to the inten­tions and style of the book. Richard Base­hart was fine as that sim­ple soul, Ish­mael, and Leo Genn per­formed bril­liant­ly in the role of Star­buck. The spe­cial effects were superb for their time, though they might embar­rass a film-mak­er today. Visu­al detail was accurate.

The world of the New Bed­ford whalers in the 1840s holds many sur­pris­es for a mod­ern view­er. It was strik­ing­ly cos­mopoli­tan — the whal­ing ships sailed every sea in the world, and Africans, Native Amer­i­cans, Asians, Poly­ne­sians, and Euro­peans crewed the ships and walked the streets of New Bed­ford. Peo­ple were gen­uine­ly, pro­found­ly reli­gious. Unlike the pho­ny-balony “Chris­t­ian fun­da­men­tal­ists” of mod­ern Amer­i­ca, who nev­er actu­al­ly read the bible, these peo­ple knew it by heart. Melville expect­ed his read­ers to get every one of his thou­sands of bib­li­cal ref­er­ences in the nov­el. The movie cap­tures both these ele­ments exactly.